Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kailash who wrote (60888)	12/29/2005 11:52:06 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

Thank you for your thoughtful consideration on this matter. Let me clarify a couple of key points in the discussion so far. Mystery, as we have been using the term, is reference to a phenomenon that people are convinced may or may not have occurred but we are not currently able to observe the phenomenon or test it, so we are left only with speculative guesses about it. Also, I have not been arguing for an ID case or against an origin by evolution case. I have been arguing that neither is more based on scientific evidence than the other. Personally, I consider them both corrupt politicized junk arguments. The kind of stuff doltish politicians love to grasp onto. They would both be laughed out of a philosophy or theology 101 course. How that became an argument for scientists is beyond me. I began here with a part one and part two treatment of time and eternity. I would be very interested in any contributions, or critiques you may have of this treatment. Message 21993303 Message 21993775