SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Vosilla who wrote (46329)12/30/2005 2:52:57 AM
From: Live2SailRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
<Too many people are afraid of cold weather.>

That sure didn't stop other areas from skyrocketing. Aspen, Jackson Hole, Milwaukee, Burlington ect.. Perhaps global warming and demographic trends heading downhill in many sunbelt markets and large cities in the northeast will help?


Don't forget that the NYT article didn't say anything about appreciation, just affordability. Rochester may have appreciated, I don't know.

Three of the four you cite above are resorts (not a fair comparison) or resort-ish. I know Burlington better than Rochester. It's a nicer place to live than Rochester. The schools aren't as good ,and the winters are colder (less snow), but it's better skiing. One thing that happened to Burlington is Jet Blue came to town. Wall Streeters live a nice life in VT and commute down to NYC. Also, that wealthy, multi-home owning, gay population recently highlighted in the NYT is attracted to now-liberal VT. The NYT graphic shows affordability of Burlington staying relatively constant.

I'm not sure why upstate NY has been left for dead (high taxes, perhaps), but I find it hard to believe that Milwaukee has anything on it.



To: John Vosilla who wrote (46329)12/30/2005 10:38:09 AM
From: bentwayRespond to of 306849
 
Maybe places like Rochester just need to build artificial ski mountains?