To: bruwin who wrote (22906 ) 12/30/2005 5:01:26 PM From: Carl Worth Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78740 bruwin: perhaps, since you clearly won't let the subject go, or respond with posts that are less than 2000 words in length, you could at least space your posts a bit more generously, so that they are readable <G> HANS is trading at 30 times next year's estimated earnings, with a growth rate of 25% in said year...that is NOT value, as you yourself stated: I get the impression, from what you say, that what you and others on this Board are looking for, are currently undervalued stocks that have a currently unrecognised inherent value which, if bought now, will reward the investor at a later date. HANS very well may be higher one year from now, but it isn't undervalued at the current time, to argue such is ludicrous it's very true that value is in the eye of the beholder, what is value to me may not be to paul, or to mcsweet, and vice versa that said, it's equally clear that no true value investor would be buying HANS at this point...those are the facts, no matter what 2000 words you want to respond with EBAY posted strong results for years, and the stock rose commensurate with those results, but it was never a value stock...those are called GROWTH stocks, some even look for GARP stocks, but they still aren't value stocks, no matter how well the share price does finally, as has been suggested numerous times already, why not just let the HANS discussion go, you made some good money on it, as did i, but it's not on topic here, and since you appear to believe you are the supreme stock analyst of all time, why don't you give us some of your brilliant new ideas so that we have something to look over through the long weekend <g> feel free to flame away, but at least limit each paragraph to 7 or 8 lines, and put a space between the paragraphs...LOL