SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (8258)1/3/2006 12:42:37 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541373
 
If it took twenty years to become addicted to alcohol, then there would be no young alcoholics, which we know is not the case.



To: epicure who wrote (8258)1/3/2006 2:37:32 PM
From: KLP  Respond to of 541373
 
I was precise when I said:

Alcohol generally takes 20 years or more to become addicted...although its effects are readily known on a short term basis. (i.e. driving irresponsibly, beating up other people, etc)...

Many of the current group of drugs is addictive within two weeks or in other short periods of time


Yes, there are a "few" young alcoholics who are addicted. In comparison to the numbers of people who drink alcohol, there are very few who become addicted in a short time.

But that timeframe doesn't appear to be true about the drugs.....



To: epicure who wrote (8258)1/3/2006 2:39:59 PM
From: Suma  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541373
 
You are so right about the alcohol... I had 16 year old students addicted. I think that there is an inherent genetic predisposition.. It was on my Mother's side of the family and she always warned me...(since I had a home in the V.I. and a case of vodka was $ 15.00 ) that there was alcoholism in the family. I took it under advisement...