Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Biotech Stock Picking for Charity - 2006 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Dodgy Ticker who wrote (172)	1/4/2006 5:22:46 PM
From: scaram(o)uche	Respond to of 592

grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrroan............ :-)

To: The Dodgy Ticker who wrote (172)	1/4/2006 5:27:05 PM
From: Arthur Radley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 592

Robert...trust me on this one! There are major differences in the following words.. Along A long If you are going to quote something at least you should quote exactly what Michael said! Again, I merely suggest that you look at last year's portfolios and there was a stock shorted. If it was good enough last year then why change the rules? Again...doesn't make one whit of difference to me because it is the fact that a charity will receive funds is the goal. ++ Just for the record! The stock shorted in last year's contest was CYBX and the stock gained about 65%, making it in reality nearly the worst performing stock since it was shorted by the person who had it in his portfolio.