SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (267216)1/6/2006 12:07:21 PM
From: combjelly  Respond to of 1571398
 
"So the Fla. Copnstitution says you can treat private and public schools differently"

I'd be surprised if any state constitution said any different.



To: longnshort who wrote (267216)1/6/2006 12:10:32 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571398
 
The justices turned the accountability argument upside down, noting voucher schools are not subject to the same rigorous state regulations that apply to public schools. That, they wrote, violates the constitutional mandate for a "uniform" public school system.

"We recognize that the proponents of vouchers have a strongly held view that students should have choices. Our decision does not deny parents recourse to either public or private school alternatives to a failing school," said the 35-page ruling, authored by Chief Justice Barbara Pariente. "Only when the private school option depends upon public funding is choice limited."



To: longnshort who wrote (267216)1/6/2006 2:52:07 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571398
 
Anyway since when does a liberal believe in states' rights?

When does a neocon? Was Bush respecting state rights when he ran to the Supreme Court in 2000? I don't think so.