SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WAR on Terror. Will it engulf the Entire Middle East? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve kammerer who wrote (11100)1/6/2006 1:50:01 PM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 32591
 
Did you read my post or just skim the first line? I wont reply to such crap when i was very clear from the getgo that it was purely an academic war games type of question i was asking. The only military options presently being talked about is the air attack option--see richnorth scare posts that this is imminent. Pre-nukes conventional attack may make more sense than that so i put it out there. I am not proposting anything except that considering all options is a worthwhile effort and one of those options is of course containment and deterrence.



To: steve kammerer who wrote (11100)1/6/2006 2:31:10 PM
From: Scoobah  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 32591
 
maybe I am wrong, but I favor wide scale bunker busting bombardment, and if we require a nuclear action then so be it.