Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (153903)	1/6/2006 2:44:31 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793883

"New Lie Detector Will End Need For Voluntary Lie Detector Tests by Joe Gandelman The Department of Defense is going to try to develop a new lie detector that could prove useful in military and other operations -- but could mean then end of a lot of political careers if members of the public ever get ahold of it: THE US Department of Defense has revealed plans to develop a lie detector that can be used without the subject knowing they are being assessed. The Remote Personnel Assessment (RPA) device will also be used to pinpoint fighters hiding in a combat zone, or even to spot signs of stress that might mark someone out as a terrorist or suicide bomber. In a call for proposals on a DoD website, contractors are being given until 13 January to suggest ways to develop the RPA, which will use microwave or laser beams reflected off a subject's skin to assess various physiological parameters without the need for wires or skin contacts. The device will train a beam on "moving and non-cooperative subjects", the DoD proposal says, and use the reflected signal to calculate their pulse, respiration rate and changes in electrical conductance, known as the "galvanic skin response". "Active combatants will in general have heart, respiratory and galvanic skin responses that are outside the norm," the website says. Just imagine how this could be used in the field. Or how members of an audience watching a debate in Congress, a Presidential campaign debate or a Presidential policy statement could use it to monitor the accuracy of verbiage: If the RPA is ever produced, it is likely to prove controversial. A remote lie detector would face even more difficulties than standard polygraph tests, which were themselves the subject of a damning 2003 report from the US National Academy of Sciences. "There is no way a polygraph test can be carried out usefully without the subject knowing, because you actually want the person to worry about certain questions," says Bruce Burgess, an examiner with polygraph firm Distress Services of Leatherhead, Surrey, UK. But Steve Wright, a conflict analyst at Leeds Metropolitan University, UK, raises the prospect of people identified as suspects by the device being captured and subjected to secret "prisoner rendition" as a result. And he warns that the RPA could introduce a "chill factor" into everyday life. What? Suggesting a government would ever take advantage of this and push the envelope? What government would ever do that?" themoderatevoice.com

To: Lane3 who wrote (153903)	1/6/2006 4:09:17 PM
From: Ish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793883

<<There has been a controversy for years--since testing for DNA first became available--regarding whether DNA testing should be available for old, closed cases.>> A&E had a case where a guy was convicted of raping a 6 year old girl and killing her mother. The DNA didn't match but the girl identified him, even though the room was dark and she was stressed. He went for a retrial and was turned down. Years later he noticed another convict from his neighborhood who smoked a cigarette and tossed the butt. He grabbed the butt and sent it to his lawyer who had a DNA test done and bingo, it was a match. The smoker later confessed. After 7 years in jail the first convict solved the crime and was released. Another case in Illinois, a guy who had done 10 of 20 was released on parole when a DNA test was done on his rape case that came up negative and the victim confessed it wasn't him. This idiot was released on parole until the governor signed his pardon. First night out he goes to a bar and gets in a fight. With a pardon in his pocket for the original crime he has to serve the rest of his time for violating parole.