Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (267307)	1/7/2006 10:48:25 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578038

re: Looks like there is no longer any doubt that Saddam was involved in the training of jihadis/terrorists: weeklystandard.com Sounds like there is A LOT of doubt to me (first assuming you believe the article)... The main worry, says DiRita, is that the mainstream press might cherry-pick documents and mischaracterize their meaning. "There is always the concern that people would be chasing a lot of information good or bad, and when the Times or the Post splashes a headline about some sensational-sounding document that would seem to 'prove' that sanctions were working, or that Saddam was just a misunderstood patriot, or some other nonsense, we'd spend a lot of time chasing around after it."

To: RetiredNow who wrote (267307)	1/7/2006 10:04:57 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1578038

Looks like there is no longer any doubt that Saddam was involved in the training of jihadis/terrorists: weeklystandard.com; That would be the case if you happen to read the Weekly Standard or Newsmax........in fact, I think one of them still claims we found WMDs. Of course, the rest of the world has moved on.....but that doesn't stop them [the Weekly and Newsmax] from keep trying to prove that Bush did not lie.