Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (267308)	1/7/2006 9:57:30 AM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573889

Hi mary, what if 10 years from now we find out that the mile long convoy that made its way to Syria just prior to our invasion, was indeed filled with WMD? How would that impact your opinion? Just curious.

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (267308)	1/20/2006 6:14:15 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573889

I know you can't speak for Ted, but I'll ask you the same question. Neccessary for what? When the truth came out wrt WMD, the "necessary" case for war ended. Even with the WMD it probably was not a war that was "necessary for the survival or territorial integrity of our nation". Even without a WMD stockpile it may be a war that is/was necessary for some lesser purpose. With the help of people like you, the administration is trying to redefine "necessary". The administration may or may not be trying to redefine it. I'm not. I'm asking you for your definition. Feel free to pick anyone you want as long as you are willing to stick with it. Tim