Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (154019)	1/7/2006 10:45:47 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793841

See my 2nd sentence. You missed it. LOL! What makes you think I missed your second sentence, which was "I've just read the other reviews, and decided to not watch trash."? I think it should be pretty clear in my post that I was aware that you had not seen the show and were relying on pre-broadcast commentary when I said "You don't sound curious. It sounds like you bought into the outrage machine's pre-broadcast reaction, hook, line, and sinker." So did you recommend this program as one to see and waste time with My original commentary on the show related to the controversy. I offered no observations on the show's quality and no recommendation. I don't care for soaps, either. This show is not something I would normally watch nor would I particularly recommend it. I would not have watched it but for the controversy. I may watch a few more episodes to see how the controversy goes. For folks who like soaps but would prefer something tamer than most TV fare, I guess it would be an OK show. I could recommend it to them. It's definitely not must-see-TV. OTOH, it held my attention for two hours so it couldn't be all bad. There were a couple of interesting story lines. It's hard to tell from pilots but I would imagine this show would be somewhere in the middle in terms of quality.