Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (267324)	1/7/2006 12:50:41 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573927

Or that of keeping their skin alive and awell and not to draw the attention of the Saddam agents that would gladly silence their voices forever? What would be the reason for anyone to hide knowledge of WMD's now and since the end of the invasion? Neoconcservatives and Bush administration officials would bestow hugs, kisses, flowers and perhaps a few shekals if anyone will come up with any knowledge of WMD. I think the Bush have gotten over the fact that there was no WMD. It would seem to be foolish for anyone else to hold on to the wish that there was WMD in the time frame in question. Yes, it is hard to accept being wrong over something that you were sure about.

To: RetiredNow who wrote (267324)	1/8/2006 3:34:37 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573927

I believe in the most powerful human trait of all and that is the instinct for self-preservation. When the invasion began, scientists started getting murdered. What instinct do you think prevailed? That of helping the Americans complete the Iraqi humiliation by telling the Americans about Saddam's WMD program? Or that of keeping their skin alive and awell and not to draw the attention of the Saddam agents that would gladly silence their voices forever? You have an overactive imagination......have you thought about writing for Hollywood???