SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (267489)1/8/2006 1:29:23 PM
From: American Spirit  Respond to of 1572172
 
The rightwing killed the Kennedys, not Castro, you idiot. The Kennedy assassinations both required massive cover-ups. Not to mention back-up operatives, brainwashing and killing witnesses.

Castro had no ability to do that. Nor would he have a motive. Replacing the Kennedys with LBJ and Nixon would not interest Castro, only the rightwing, especially the military-industrial Texas rightwing.

Sirhan was a brainwashed patsy like Oswald. In both cases, there was at least one additional shooter. Someone was pulling strings. Probably Hoover and the rightwing end of the CIA along with some help from a mafia figure or two. The Texas rightwing had to have also been involved to some degree to pull it off. The coverups required accomplices high up in our government and intelligence communities. Which is why when Bush acts like a dictator we know never to trust the fact that "it could never happen here". It already has. The Kennedy killings were rightwing coup d'etats against democracy. They also knocked off Wallace. Why? Because he was threatening to suck the rightwing racist vote away from Nixon.