Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (267591)	1/8/2006 8:34:54 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577883

A fragmented Iraq is probably the most destabilizing thing that could occur in that not too stable region. Unfortunately we are likely to see the destabilizing effects of a determined attempt at keeping a united Iraq. We will end up policing the Shia's attempts at controlling the Sunnis. No fun, plus Shia & Sunni will be taking pot shots at us all the while. I agree with you regarding Shiastan, although I don't see any alternatives to prevent it. Kurdistan already exists for all practical purposes, and that existence is going to become more obvious and more concrete as time goes on. Turkey, Syria, and Iran can scream all they want, but if one or all of them step out of line they'll be introduced to modern precision bombing, not something any of them desire. Its Loserstan as you call it thats the problem. If we march out of Iraq without settling the question, in a few years the Sunnis will be back on top of the Shia, with some Saddam replacement.