SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Stock Picking for Charity - 2006 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sjemmeri who wrote (256)1/8/2006 7:19:51 PM
From: John McCarthy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 592
 
Steve .....

I pledge $200 to the winner's charity and will 10X that if someone will tell me who it's going to be.

Nice gesture ..... and thank you!

I don't know the final determination on entry dates but
if your still interested you might want to post to FiloF and Rick .....

regards,
John



To: sjemmeri who wrote (256)1/8/2006 10:43:36 PM
From: Mike McFarland  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 592
 
A consensus portfolio apparently is not likely
to be skillful (not enough members of the group
with skill). So I suspect that most portfolios
that have a lot of high consensus picks will do
poorly. Extending the rationale ever further,
portfolios with the greatest number of "singletons"
could do well?

BLINDG, Texas, Robert, KRUNCH, Jorgen, and myself
all have the greatest number of singltons at 4.
I like Texases portfolio--it has concentration,
nearly half the portfolio is in just four stocks.
But I like my own even more, three stocks equal
half the portfolio--and all three are singletons.

Of course, contestents that choose singletons
may not have any skill either. I have been playing
a lot of texas holdem lately, so you will have to
excuse the gaming oriented blather.

edit--I see that KRUNCH has three stocks which
make up 60% of the portfolio, but only one is
a singleton. Two stocks were chosen by 6 or 7
other contestents. Jorgen has two singletons that
make up 40% of his portfolio, not bad, but who knows?

Frankly, I'd put my money on Rick--if he had chosen new
stocks or made an effort to refine his portfolio.