Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (267760)	1/10/2006 10:50:46 AM
From: Taro	Respond to of 1575623

Reminds me of the Piltdown man, not quite science but close enough. Taro

To: steve harris who wrote (267760)	1/10/2006 11:43:28 AM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1575623

There is no such thing as an "unborn child". That's a contradiction in terms If something is unborn it doesn't exist yet. By your logic, the nocturnal discharge you had last night could be classified as "thousands of unborn children".Why not? Or how about the eggs you ate this morning classified as "three unborn chickens". The religious right's whole argument is ridiculous and irrational, plus there's nothing in the Bible about it at all. No more than a big dirty trick to try and raise money from gullible prudes and take away peoples' sexual satisfaction so they'll suffer more. Sex is a good thing. It's good for you. But birth control is necessary. And in case of an accident, take RU-486. No abortions will ever be necessary.