Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: catflu2™ who wrote (26577)	1/10/2006 8:04:08 PM
From: MGV	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

I'm fine but I'd be happy to help you. You have any number of flawed assumptions. Your last statement eschews fundamental analysis and makes you miserably wrong if your perspective is anything longer than the short term and analytically incomplete at best. Even if your timing cohort were to hold a defensible track record, you gloss over many issues that are material to risk analysis for equity trading. The fact is that his timing record is so poor that it is apparent even from those who haven't had to pay for his faulty representations in fees and capital losses. By the way, if you rely on this guy, how do you defend against the observation that you do not think for yourself and have excessively poor judgement to boot? If I want to assess stock recommendations, I favor people who disclose their positions, are honest about their mistakes when they make them, have less mistakes than successes, and combine accurate fundamental analysis with TA. Cramer is a hands down better choice than your stock tout across the board. Consider why your guy is limited to writing pigeon english on an internet bulletin board and Cramer has the broad distribution he does. Maybe you'd like Cramer better?