Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (268505)	1/14/2006 7:44:02 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575849

re: I wouldn't even use the word "cost" at all with tax cuts. The costs are what the government spends. Taxes aren't the costs but how the costs are covered. They "cost" the treasury money; the word "cost" has more than one meaning, re: If its the whole period I hardly think it reasonable to say that they have a "high cost". Of course $146B is a high "cost"; more so when you tack it on top of ~$400Billion (or more) in annual deficit spending. Why does deficit spending not offend you; why do you support it? Do you love Bush so much that you are willing to mortgage the countries future?