SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: altair19 who wrote (54655)1/13/2006 11:02:13 PM
From: SiouxPal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361609
 
Did we get syrup with that?



To: altair19 who wrote (54655)1/15/2006 1:44:27 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 361609
 
Don't Bench Alito - Sam the Sham, Part II

By Justin Frank, M.D.*

huffingtonpost.com

01.14.2006

A good judge, like a good umpire, has to call 'em like he sees 'em. Each umpire, despite official parameters, has his own definition of what the strike zone is. Not only that, the league amends those parameters from time to time, just as congress that amends the US constitution.

For me, the truth-telling baseball aphorism is this: You can't tell the players without a scorecard.
We need to have their numbers in order to get their number, so to speak. While it is true that umpires control the game and regulate play, members of the Supreme Court are more than umps - they are players in a three-team game. Their judicial decisions affect the legislative and executive branches - and paradoxically, they are all ultimately on the same team - trying to do what they is best for the American people as they interpret our laws.

But rather than seeing Supreme Court justices as umpires, I prefer the analogy of designated hitter--in the game, but not a position player (i.e. not members of legislative or executive "teams"). And we know that no hitter hits a home run every time; he doesn't even get a hit each time at bat. In fact, nobody gets a hit half of the time. But a good hitter is above all, consistent.

Alito has a steady swing - a bottom-up approach to each case before him. He says he is open-minded and that he studies each pitcher separately before he steps up to the plate. His law clerks say he practices his swing long and hard, and that he does so with good spirit and team camaraderie. He listens to those who tell him what to watch for in a particular pitcher, and that helps determine his approach. Because of his intense study, Alito can hit any pitch and can adjust his swing to hit the ball well.

But in the final analysis it is not how much you study, not how diligent, kind, or brilliant you are. It is where you hit the ball. Judge Alito hits the ball regularly to the same place - far right field. No matter how brilliant or clever, at the end of the day he is one-trick pony.

All we really know about Alito is what we learn by studying his stats. And that record reveals that for fifteen years Alito has supported government power at the expense of the individual citizen. The far right has studied his record, which is why they are such enthusiastic supporters. They know that in the final analysis what a player says at a press conference or in the locker room - not to mention in a Senate hearing room - is immaterial. He is ultimately known only by his record. And the far right likes the odds with Alito.

What disturbs me is that so many Senators act as if the record means nothing - that what matters to them is how he answered their questions the second week of January, 2006. They rely on what his teammates say about his work ethic and kind heart. It's simple-minded to rely on Alito's assurances that he has no agenda, that he approaches each case in a state of phenomenological reduction. Not surprisingly the media doesn't even begin to understand the problem - it focused on his wife's tears when a pitcher struck him out.

Even Alito's membership in the bigoted CAP organization is consistent with his dignified demeanor in front of the Senate. In both cases he was trying to impress prospective employers that he was the right man for the job.

It's the record, stupid. The senators who support Alito's nomination know that record better than anyone. To send this player to the highest bench in the land is a black mark on the nation's record, and our children will pay the penalty for decades to come.
____________________________________________________

*Justin Frank M.D. is an expert in the field of psychoanalysis. A clinician with more than thirty year's experience, Dr. Frank has also been a former columnist for Salon magazine and is a frequent writer on topics as diverse as politics, film, and theater. He is the co-director of the Metropolitan Center for Object Relations in New York, a clinical professor in the Department of Psychiatry at George Washington University Medical Center, and a teaching analyst at the Washington Psychoanalytic Institute.

Dr. Frank used the principles of applied psychoanalysis to assemble a comprehensive psychological profile of President George W. Bush in his book Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President (ReganBooks).

Dr. Frank did his psychiatric residency at Harvard Medical School and was chief resident at the Cambridge Hospital. Dr. Frank was also awarded the DuPont-Warren Fellowship by Massachusetts General Hospital.



To: altair19 who wrote (54655)1/15/2006 11:13:09 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361609
 
Analysts: Growing Deficit Hobbles Economy

By Jeannine Aversa, AP Economics Writer

Sunday January 15, 10:13 pm ET

Analysts Fear Expanding U.S. Deficits Endanger Economic Health, Lead to Higher Borrowing Costs

biz.yahoo.com

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Like a person packing on pounds, the United States keeps adding to its flabby budget deficits, endangering the nation's economic health and the pocketbooks of ordinary Americans. Here's the worry: Persistent deficits will lead to higher borrowing costs for consumers and companies, slowing economic activity.

As Uncle Sam seeks to borrow ever more to finance those deficits, rates on Treasury securities would rise to entice investors. That would push up other interest rates, such as home mortgages, many auto loans, some home equity lines of credit and some credit cards.

"That's the pocketbook risk to the American consumer," said Greg McBride, a senior financial analyst at Bankrate.com, an online financial service.

For businesses, rates on corporate bonds would climb. It would become more expensive to borrow to pay for new plants and equipment and other capital investments.

With a succession of budget deficits, "you do expect to see higher interest rates. Where we fight about this is over how big the effects are. But they are definitely there," said James Feyrer, assistant economics professor at Dartmouth College.

The government's budget deficit last year was $319 billion. While smaller than the record $413 billion in 2004, it still was the third-highest ever.

A White House budget official now predicts that the deficit in the current budget year will top $400 billion, pushed up by the costs of the Gulf Coast hurricanes. The red ink is expected to keep flowing for years.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office forecasts deficits every year through 2015; that is as far out as the office projects. The White House forecast, which runs to 2010, also expects annual shortfalls.

"The budget deficit is like gaining weight. You are not really aware of it until at some point, all of a sudden you can't do what you want to do because you are heavier. Interest rates go up and slow things down," said Brian Bethune, economist at Global Insight. "Then you go to your check up and the doctor tells you you got to lose 25 pounds."

America's economic doctor is Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan.

Greenspan, who retires Jan. 31 after 18-plus years at the central bank, repeatedly has urged Congress and the Bush administration to get the country's financial house in order.

Bloated budget deficits, if not curbed, could endanger the economy over the long term, Greenspan warned. Increased government borrowing would drive up interest rates and weigh down economic activity.

"In the end, the consequences for the U.S. economy of doing nothing could be severe," he said recently.

The looming retirement of 78 million baby boomers will put massive strains on the country's finances, Greenspan said.

In 2008, the oldest of the boomers will reach 62, the earliest age at which they can tap Social Security retirement benefits. Three years after that, in 2011, they will reach 65 and become eligible for Medicare.

Ben Bernanke, chosen by President Bush to succeed Greenspan, also believes the situation is troubling and that the deficits need to be controlled.

"Budget deficits are a problem," he said. "I think it's important to continue to reduce budget deficits."

The administration has a goal of cutting the deficit in half by 2009 and plans to do that by restraining spending. The president, meanwhile, is continuing to press Congress to make his tax cuts permanent.

Democrats mostly blame Bush's tax cuts for the government's red ink. The last time the government recorded a surplus was in 2001.

In a worst-case scenario, foreigners who finance the U.S. budget and trade deficits would sour on U.S. investments and unload their holdings. The prices of U.S. stocks and bonds could plunge. Interest rates, including those for mortgages, could soar. A financial crisis could confront the country.

Economists are troubled by the prospects of budget deficits as far as the eye can see and want to see them trimmed. But the size of the current budget deficits, while unwelcome, do not signal that a crisis is imminent, they said.

An important barometer is the size of the federal debt -- now about $8 trillion -- relative to the overall economy, as measured by gross domestic product. Under that measure, this debt accounts for around 63.2 percent of GDP, Bethune said.

"Generally speaking, when it is over 75 percent of GDP, then the yellow flag goes out. I would say 95 percent of GDP and over is definitely a red flag," Bethune said.

The government produces a budget deficit when its total spending exceeds its total revenues. Budget deficits cause the government to borrow more money by selling Treasury securities to domestic and foreign investors. That additional borrowing increases the government's debt.

Despite the recent string of large budget deficits, long-term interest rates in the U.S. have behaved well. In fact, relatively low long-term rates around the world have puzzled economists and spawned a number of theories. Some experts believe too little investment worldwide may be behind this; others believe too much savings is the reason.

From an economic point of view, there is more concern about higher borrowing costs over time crimping business investment and ultimately the production of goods and services, economists said.

"Low investment is bad. That's going to mean lower productivity and lower production in the future, which has a cost on society," said Erik Hurst, associate professor of economics at University of Chicago's Graduate School of Business.

People who save would benefit, assuming inflation stayed under control. If the deficits fanned inflation, then the Fed would need to boost interest rates, pushing a whole range of borrowing costs even higher.