Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Crabbe who wrote (3383)	1/15/2006 3:50:23 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219609

<If these creatures are so vicious and such killers why are there still Bryde's whales left in the ocean?> It's the balance of nature. They don't find all of them. Mostly they are eating other things which are more common. Wolves? That's another good thing to clean out! I used to have nightmares about them. So did one of our daughters. Vicious bastards. While getting rid of all of them, we could get rid of lots of dog breeds too which have distilled the worst part of the wolf. There's a very simple basic principle; if it threatens me or my DNA, it's game over for the threat. Apply that principle and we can easily determine good and evil and what should be wiped out. With some reflection, I can see it could get complicated in that sometimes, in the event of over crowding of humans for example, it would be better to keep fish DNA and get rid of a load of human DNA which is least like mine. Maoris used to apply that principle with cannibalism of competing tribes [the men anyway] while having no desire to exterminate all fish. Mqurice