Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Square_Dealings who wrote (49775)	1/14/2006 9:40:31 PM
From: NOW	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

if there is one thing Russ appears NOT to be is full of himself... why the hostility?

To: Square_Dealings who wrote (49775)	1/14/2006 10:33:09 PM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

I have learned (first hand I might add) that violent disagreements with Russ are often a short lived victories. Personally I do not care if he is right or wrong here, he has contributed more than almost anyone on SI. Besides you have stepped over the line to taunting someone who just took a 100% profit and that is totally wrong. Mish

To: Square_Dealings who wrote (49775)	1/15/2006 8:29:49 AM
From: re3	Respond to of 110194

Why does a low price automatically make it "extreme" ? If one of these stocks had done a reverse split and traded at 10 bucks, would that have changed anything for you ? what would you have bought instead (to play the gold market) ? edit, i think one of the hall of fame posters who doesn't post on s.i. any more might have said years ago something to the effect that selective low priced gold shares are like perpetual calls on the price of gold...