Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (183075)	1/15/2006 2:03:28 PM
From: brushwud	Respond to of 186894

I really don't know but I am guessing...Intel doesn't say they have served any one nor does it say they intend to... According to the article: Lawyers for both companies issued a stipulation to the Delaware district court... "AMD has served, and Intel anticipates serving, subpoenas duces tecum on computer industry customers, retailers and other third parties," said the filing. So Intel stipulated in writing to the court that it "anticipates serving...subpoenas...on computer industry customers," get it? as far as witnesses being upset, if AMD subpoenas someone it is because they are accusing then of Criminal conspiracy. If an Intel customer gives in to an Intel threat, that makes them a victim of extortion, not a co-conspirator. And it might make such a customer hesitant to give over documents for fear of threats being carried out. This is a document request. This is a non-event. For the Droids to be parading this sort of thing around as news, MEANS THAT ABSOLUTELY NOTHING IS HAPPENING IN THE CASE. It's not a document request, although it will remove one kind of objection to a document request. It's a court filing made by Intel (and AMD), which represents some small progress in the case as would be expected at this time.