SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (54788)1/15/2006 11:45:22 PM
From: SiouxPal  Respond to of 361517
 
Every Dem Senator and Rep. should have to read that post.



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (54788)1/16/2006 12:47:03 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361517
 
Chile elects first woman president

msnbc.msn.com

MSNBC News Services

Updated: 10:02 p.m. ET Jan. 15, 2006

SANTIAGO, Chile - A socialist doctor and former political prisoner was elected Sunday as the country’s first female president, defeating a conservative multimillionaire opponent in a race that reflected Latin America’s increasingly leftward tilt.

The victory of Michelle Bachelet — a political prisoner during the dictatorship of Gen. Augusto Pinochet and defense minister in the current administration — extends the rule of the market-friendly, center-left coalition that has governed since the end of Pinochet’s 1973-90 rule.

“Who would have said, 10, 15 years ago — that a woman would be elected president!” Bachelet told thousands of supporters.

The 54-year-old made clear she intends to maintain the free-market polices that have turned Chile’s economy into one of the strongest in the region.

“We will continue to walk the same road,” she said

With more than 97 percent of some 7.2 million votes counted, Bachelet had 53 percent of the vote to just over 46 percent for Sebastian Pinera, who congratulated his opponent on her victory but vowed “to continue to fight for our principles, which do not die today.”

Sunday’s runoff was necessary after a Dec. 11 election involving four candidates failed to produce a winner with a majority.

Her political success has baffled many Chileans who thought a left-leaning single mother jailed during Pinochet’s dictatorship stood little chance in this socially conservative country.

Popular among military
Current President Ricardo Lagos made her his health minister, then in 2002 named her defense minister. She won praise for helping heal divisions between civilians and military left over from the dictatorship.

Bachelet had expected resistance from Chile’s conservative military establishment when appointed defense minister. “I was a woman, separated, a socialist, an agnostic ... all possible sins together,” said Bachelet, who nonetheless became a popular figure among the admirals and generals.

Bachelet’s gender still prompts questions she does not like.

“You wouldn’t be asking that question if I was a man,” she once chided a Chilean reporter who asked if she would marry again.

But she did answer: “The truth is that I haven’t had the time to even think about that. My next four years will be dedicated to work.”

Bachelet will be only the third woman directly elected president of a Latin American country, following Violeta Chamorro, who governed Nicaragua from 1990 to 1997, and Mireya Moscoso, president of Panama from 1999 to 2004.

A long, hard road to power
However, Bachelet, unlike those two women, did not follow a politically prominent husband into power.

Bachelet’s father was an air force general who was arrested and tortured for opposing the 1973 coup that brought Pinochet to power. Alberto Bachelet died in prison of a heart attack, probably caused by the torture, Bachelet says.

A 22-year-old medical student at the time, Bachelet was also arrested along with her mother and later forced into five years of exile, first in Australia, then in communist East Germany. She married a fellow Chilean exile while in East Germany. Back in Chile, they separated, and she had a third child from a new relationship.

Lagos, the mentor she is following into power, has deftly balanced his socialist ideology with market-oriented economics and enjoys an approval rate above 70 percent. Lagos is constitutionally prohibited from seeking immediate re-election, but as he voted, his backers chanted “2010,” referring to the next election.

In a speech to the nation after congratulating Bachelet on the phone, Lagos said, “We now have a new Chile, we have for the first time in our history a woman president.”

Platform of economic reform
In spite of their different political backgrounds and ideologies, both Bachelet and Pinera outlined similar goals, promising to continue the two-decade-long free-market policies that have made Chile’s economy one of the healthiest in the region.

Both said they would fight to lower the 8 percent unemployment rate, improve public health, housing and education services and curb rising urban crime. They also promised to reform Chile’s 25-year-old private social security systems to ensure better pensions for retirees, though neither has given details of how.

“By the end of my government in 2010 we will have consolidated a system of social protection that will give Chileans and their families the tranquility that they will have a decent job,” Bachelet said Sunday.

Lagos and Bachelet belong to the same Socialist Party as Salvador Allende, whose leftist policies prompted Pinochet’s bloody coup. But the party allied with other major left-center parties in 1990 to oust the right wing, and their coalition has held while leading Chile into a free-trade pact with the United States, cutting inflation and fostering growth of about 6 percent a year.

Chile’s next president will be inaugurated on March 11, joining the ranks of Latin American leaders including leftists such as Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez and newly elected Evo Morales of Bolivia.

Bachelet indicated she would work with all the region’s leaders. “We shouldn’t take Latin America back to the Cold War. Chavez, Morales, they are presidents elected by their peoples. Chile must have relationships with all of them.”

Pinochet was not a factor in the campaign, and his spokesman, retired Gen. Guillermo Garin, said he paid little attention to it. At 90, Pinochet is ailing and was only recently freed from house arrest. He faces charges of human rights abuses and corruption stemming from his 17-year rule.



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (54788)1/16/2006 12:54:55 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 361517
 
Washington Post editorial today: Confirm Samuel Alito

[this is from the same Washington Post that endorsed pre-emptively attacking Iraq and FAILED to seriously investigate election fraud in 2004]

Sunday, January 15, 2006; Page B06

THE SENATE'S decision concerning the confirmation of Samuel A. Alito Jr. is harder than the case last year of now-Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. Judge Alito's record raises concerns across a range of areas. His replacement of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor could alter -- for the worse, from our point of view -- the Supreme Court's delicate balance in important areas of constitutional law. He would not have been our pick for the high court. Yet Judge Alito should be confirmed, both because of his positive qualities as an appellate judge and because of the dangerous precedent his rejection would set.

Though some attacks on him by Democratic senators and liberal interest groups have misrepresented his jurisprudence, Judge Alito's record is troubling in areas. His generally laudable tendency to defer to elected representatives at the state and federal levels sometimes goes too far -- giving rise to concerns that he will prove too tolerant of claims of executive power in the war on terror. He has tended at times to read civil rights statutes and precedents too narrowly. He has shown excessive tolerance for aggressive police and prosecutorial tactics. There is reason to worry that he would curtail abortion rights. And his approach to the balance of power between the federal government and the states, while murky, seems unpromising. Judge Alito's record is complicated, and one can therefore argue against imputing to him any of these tendencies. Yet he is undeniably a conservative whose presence on the Supreme Court is likely to produce more conservative results than we would like to see.

Which is, of course, just what President Bush promised concerning his judicial appointments. A Supreme Court nomination isn't a forum to refight a presidential election. The president's choice is due deference -- the same deference that Democratic senators would expect a Republican Senate to accord the well-qualified nominee of a Democratic president.

And Judge Alito is superbly qualified. His record on the bench is that of a thoughtful conservative, not a raging ideologue. He pays careful attention to the record and doesn't reach for the political outcomes he desires. His colleagues of all stripes speak highly of him. His integrity, notwithstanding efforts to smear him, remains unimpeached.

Humility is called for when predicting how a Supreme Court nominee will vote on key issues, or even what those issues will be, given how people and issues evolve. But it's fair to guess that Judge Alito will favor a judiciary that exercises restraint and does not substitute its judgment for that of the political branches in areas of their competence. That's not all bad. The Supreme Court sports a great range of ideological diversity but less disagreement about the scope of proper judicial power. The institutional self-discipline and modesty that both Judge Alito and Chief Justice Roberts profess could do the court good if taken seriously and applied apolitically.

Supreme Court confirmations have never been free of politics, but neither has their history generally been one of party-line votes or of ideology as the determinative factor. To go down that road is to believe that there exists a Democratic law and a Republican law -- which is repugnant to the ideal of the rule of law. However one reasonably defines the "mainstream" of contemporary jurisprudence, Judge Alito's work lies within it. While we harbor some anxiety about the direction he may push the court, we would be more alarmed at the long-term implications of denying him a seat. No president should be denied the prerogative of putting a person as qualified as Judge Alito on the Supreme Court.