SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (9168)1/17/2006 12:06:32 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 541735
 
Looks like other powers ARE taking him at his word. U.S. Wins Support In Iran Dispute
China, Russia Join Call to Suspend Nuclear Program


washingtonpost.com

By Mary Jordan and Dafna Linzer
Washington Post Foreign Service
Tuesday, January 17, 2006; A01

LONDON, Jan. 16 -- China and Russia agreed with the United States, Britain, Germany and France on Monday that Iran must completely suspend its nuclear program, the British Foreign Office said. Although the countries failed to agree on whether Iran's case should be referred to the U.N. Security Council, the Europeans applied new pressure on the Iranian government by calling for an emergency meeting of the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency on Feb. 2.

With all six nations declaring that they sought a diplomatic solution to the escalating confrontation with Iran, Russian President Vladimir Putin offered a glimmer of hope for a compromise. Putin said the Iranian government was considering a proposal from Moscow that Russia would produce enriched uranium for Iran, to ensure the material could be used only for peaceful purposes.

Iran has adamantly reserved the right to develop its nuclear program, stating that its intention is to produce peaceful nuclear energy. But many world leaders are increasingly alarmed by the attitude of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad -- who has called for Israel to be "wiped off the map" -- and fear he could be trying to build nuclear bombs. Intense deliberations began last week after the Iranian government ordered the removal of seals on equipment at an enrichment plant where it had ceased operations two years ago.

"The onus is on Iran to act to give the international community confidence that its nuclear program has exclusive peaceful purposes," said British Foreign Minister Jack Straw. Straw added that confidence in Iran has been "sorely undermined by its history of concealment and deception."

Britain, France and Germany -- the three countries that have been leading negotiations with Iran -- and the United States all favor referring the case to the Security Council. Following a meeting of the six nations in London on Monday, a British Foreign Ministry official said Russia and China now agree on the importance of Iran "fully suspending" its nuclear program. On the issue of referral to the Security Council, another government official said that China remained "slightly hesitant" but that Russia was "coming around" on the issue. Still, neither the Bush administration nor the Europeans were able to wrangle any guarantee from Russia or China for support once the issue gets to the Security Council, and Western diplomats said they doubted whether Moscow or Beijing would be willing to impose any sanctions on a major trading partner.

Britain, France and Germany then called for an "extraordinary" meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna next month. The U.N. agency's 35-nation board could refer the issue to the Security Council. Iranian officials have threatened to block U.N. inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities if the case is referred to the council.

In addition, Iranian officials have warned that U.N. sanctions would lead to major increases in world oil prices, which have skyrocketed in the last year and could rise significantly if there were another international crisis.

Putin spoke in Moscow after discussing Iran in a meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Offering rare optimistic words on the issue, Putin said, "Our partners said that they do not rule out the possibility of putting our proposal into practice."

Putin also cautioned against what he called any rash moves in dealing with Iran, a close economic partner of Russia and China. "The Iranian nuclear problem requires a very accurate approach without rash or erroneous moves," Putin said. "Russia will continue to cooperate with European and U.S. colleagues in promoting a solution to the issue. Russia, Germany, our European partners and the United States -- we all have very similar approaches to the Iranian problem."

Iran's ambassador to Russia praised Putin's proposal on Russian television, according to the Associated Press. "As far as Russia's proposal is concerned, we consider it constructive and are carefully studying it. This is a good initiative to resolve the situation. We believe that Iran and Russia should find a way out of this jointly," Gholamreza Ansari said.

U.S. and European officials said the scheduling of the Feb. 2 IAEA meeting would give Iran time to suspend its enrichment-related work and seriously reexamine the Russian offer. U.S. officials also said they hoped the outcome of the London meeting would be seen as a clear message both to Iran and to other members of the IAEA board that the five permanent members of the Security Council -- China, Russia, France, Britain and the United States -- were united on some basic aspects of the Iran case.

The IAEA would also have more time to complete an assessment of the current status of Iran's program. The IAEA, in its third year of an investigation of Iran's nuclear program, has not found proof of a weapons program. But a final conclusion is impossible, IAEA officials have said, until the Iranian government provides full access to several sites as well as answers to outstanding questions about the history of the nuclear effort.

U.S. officials had been pushing for an IAEA board meeting next week ahead of President Bush's State of the Union address. But Europeans officials felt strongly that more time was needed to win support from Russia, China, India and some other influential board members, such as Brazil and South Africa.

Linzer reported from Washington. Correspondent Peter Finn in Moscow contributed to this report.

© 2006 The Washington Post Company



To: epicure who wrote (9168)1/17/2006 5:13:06 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541735
 
I think you are mistaken about that. Taking it seriously as heated language, is different from taking him at his word.

Gosh.. Maybe Admadinijad is just fabricating all of this talk about nuclear weapons and uranimum enrichment, wiping Israel off the map, and claiming that the 12th Imam is soon to appear to wage Jihad against the Infidels (US.. )

kenwheaton.blogspot.com

proteinwisdom.com

Among the true believers is Iran’s hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who predicted with “no doubt” his June election victory, months in advance, at a time when polls gave him barely 1 percent support. The president also spoke of an aura that wreathed him throughout his controversial UN speech in September.

“O mighty Lord,” Mr. Ahmadinejad intoned to his surprised audience, “I pray to you to hasten the emergence of your last repository, the promised one, that perfect and pure human being, the one that will fill this world with justice and peace.”

Later, at a private meeting with a cleric that was caught on video, Ahmadinejad shared his views of the moment. “I felt that all of a sudden the atmosphere changed, and for 27 to 28 minutes the leaders did not blink,” he said. “They were astonished…. it had opened their eyes and ears for the message of the Islamic Republic.”

A spokesman last week dismissed the video as fake (other sources confirm it is authentic), and denied that Ahmadinejad bases decisions on “heavenly affairs.” But this presidential obsession with the Mahdaviat [belief in the second coming] yields a certitude that leaves little room for compromise.

From redressing the gulf between rich and poor in Iran, to challenging the United States and Israel and enhancing Iran’s power with nuclear programs, every issue is designed to lay the foundation for the Mahdi’s return.

************************

And people think Bush is a religious freak??

We'd better take Admadinejad at his word. Ignoring him, and just pooh-poohing his megalo-manic ranting and ravings might just find us staring in the face of a re-invigorated Islamic (shi'ite) revolution..

That bolds poorly for any peace and stability between the Arabs and Persians.

Hawk