Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: geode00 who wrote (55096)	1/18/2006 4:03:32 AM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 362514

DELAY PROPOSES SENDING ABRAMOFF TO PLUTO borowitzreport.com Would Become First Disgraced Lobbyist in Space Wednesday , January 18, 2006 As NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft waited on a launch pad at Cape Canaveral to embark on a nine-and-a-half year mission to Pluto, Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Texas) took to the floor of the House of Representative to propose sending former lobbyist Jack Abramoff on the first manned mission to that mysterious planet. Rep. DeLay’s dramatic proposal surprised many in Congress, since the Texas lawmaker had never seemed so impassioned about the nation’s space program in the past. But in a forty-five minute speech to the House, Rep DeLay made an emotional plea for $42.7 billion in funding that would make Jack Abramoff the first disgraced lobbyist in space. “If I could choose any American to put in a rocket ship and send into space for nine and a half years, that American would be Jack Abramoff,” Rep. DeLay told his colleagues. The Texas congressman’s surprising proposal immediately drew widespread support in Congress, particularly among congressmen implicated in the ongoing lobbying corruption probe. Rep. Bob Ney (R-OH), who stepped down as Chairman of the House Administration Committee on Monday, said that he was seriously considering rescinding that decision, telling reporters, “If we wind up sending Abramoff to Pluto, that changes everything.” But House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) took to the floor to oppose the plan, saying, “Taxpayers should not foot the bill to give Jack Abramaoff a roundtrip ticket to Pluto.” Rep. DeLay, however, offered this response: “Who said it was a roundtrip ticket?” Elsewhere, President George W. Bush said that he meant to invade Iran all along, blaming the error on SpellCheck.

To: geode00 who wrote (55096)	1/18/2006 8:11:17 AM
From: Crimson Ghost	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 362514

Gore Is Right by Paul Craig Roberts Former vice president Al Gore gave what I believe to be the most important political speech in my lifetime, and the New York Times, "the newspaper of record," did not report it. Not even excerpts. For the New York Times, it was a nonevent that a former vice president and presidential candidate, denied the presidency by one vote of the Supreme Court, challenged the Bush administration for its illegalities, rending of the Constitution and disrespect for the separation of powers. So much for "the liberal press" that right-wingers rant about. If a "liberal press" exists, the New York Times is certainly no longer a member. The Washington Post had a short report on Gore’s address at Constitution Hall, but the newspaper, if that is what it is, managed to water down the seriousness and urgency of the message that Gore brought to the country with sneers. Gore’s address is the first sign of leadership from the Democratic party in six years. This alone makes it a major news event. But not even his own party took notice. According to reports, only one Democratic senator, Dianne Feinstein (CA) was in the audience. One would have thought the entire Democratic congressional delegation would have turned out in support of Gore’s challenge to Bush’s extraordinary claims of power. The lack of an opposition party makes the media vulnerable to intimidation by a dictatorial-minded administration. The New York Times ownership suppressed for one year the leaked information in the paper’s possession that the Bush administration was violating the Foreign Intelligence Services Act and was spying on Americans without court warrants. Had the New York Times not placed a gag in its reporter’s mouth and suppressed the story, Bush may have gone down in defeat as the new Richard M. Nixon. Clearly, the New York Times is failing the obligations of a free press. Bush is angry at the New York Times and at the government officials who leaked the story that Bush illegally spied on American citizens. Both may be prosecuted for making Bush’s illegal behavior public. By ignoring Gore’s speech, is the New York Times signaling to Bush that the newspaper is willing to be a lap dog in exchange for not being prosecuted? With the US media now highly concentrated in a few corporate hands, has the Democratic Party reached the conclusion that opposition is no longer possible? Once Bush places Sam Alito on the Supreme Court, he will have a high court majority friendly to his claims that his executive powers are not constrained by congressional statutes or judicial rulings. Once a president is held to be above the law, whether for reasons of his role as commander-in-chief or any other, he can no longer be held accountable. Conservatives should fear this more than anyone. The separation of powers and our civil liberties are our most precious property rights. They are our patrimony from the Founding Fathers. We are stewards of these rights, which we hold in trust for our descendants. How can any conservative fail to realize that Bush’s attack on these rights is the ultimate attack on property? It is astonishing to watch conservatives wave the flag while they are transformed into subjects to be dealt with as presidential authority decides. Gore challenged the American people to step up to the task of defending the Constitution, a task abandoned by the media, the law schools, and the Democratic and Republican parties. If we fail, darkness will close around us. January 18, 2006 Dr. Roberts [send him mail] is John M. Olin Fellow at the Institute for Political Economy and Research Fellow at the Independent Institute. He is a former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, former contributing editor for National Review, and a former assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury. He is the co-author of The Tyranny of Good Intentions.