Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (183155)	1/18/2006 2:18:45 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Respond to of 186894

:) To AK-- Do not muddy the water around you, you may have to drink it soon, Coplas!!!!!!!!!

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (183155)	1/18/2006 2:51:51 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Tench, Try keeping a consistent argument. If the expense is real, then AMD did not have a profitable year in 2004... AMD...blah-blah-...AMD...-blah-blah...AMD..." I think it is you who need to be consistent and not deviate from the main line. For example, I recently have made the following comment on the topic of option costs and stock buybacks at Intel: Message 21817833 Could you please point me out where AMD was mentioned, and how the hell it is related to the issue at hand? Yet you keep pounding on AMD and comparing incomparables. Are you afraid of something, or what is your problem? - Ali