SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gottfried who wrote (17265)1/18/2006 4:11:58 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Respond to of 25522
 
Does Having A Harvard MBA Make Someone A Better Stock Picker?
Tuesday January 17, 2:19 pm ET
By TradingMarkets Research

Does having a Harvard MBA make someone a better stock picker? We think not!

We're now two weeks into the TradingMarkets/Playboy 2006 Stock Picking Contest and 4 of the 10 Playboy models are beating 11,705 out of the 11,739 equity mutual fund managers in the United States. Yes, that's right, 4 of the Playboy models would be ranked in the top 1% of all mutual fund managers if Morningstar tracked their performance!


Here are the highlights of the contest so far:

1. 9 out of the 10 contestants are beating the S&P 500.

2. The average performance of all ten contestants is +6.45%, more than double the S&P 500.

3. Half of the contestants are beating the S&P 500 by a 2-1 margin.

4. Morningstar lists 11,739 US Stock Funds. The average return to date is 3.50%, well below the average return of the Playboy contestants. Only 12 funds out of 11,739 funds are outperforming our contest leader Christine Smith (+10.05), and our four best performing contestants rank in the top 34!

5. Here's how they would rank if the Playboy models were included in the Morningstar list:

Christine Smith +10.05% 13th out of 11,739 managers Courtney Culkin +9.87% 14th out of 11,739 managers Deanna Brooks +9.54% 18th out of 11,739 managers Amy McCarthy +8.78% 34th out of 11,739 managers

6. One of the top performing stocks this year is WebMD (NYSE:WBMD - News). This was one of Pilar Lastra's top picks. She chose it because she's a "hypochondriac" (her words, not ours), and it's one of her favorite sites. Her reasoning for selecting the stock is obviously as good (ok...better) than the thousands of money managers who rely upon PE ratios, cash flow projections, and all the dozens of other financial tools which have absolutely no statistical validity to prove they can beat the market averages (or the Playboy models!).

So what does all of this tell us? Well, obviously Harvard won't agree but it clearly says you don't need an Ivy League MBA to pick great stocks. Famed money manager Peter Lynch, who successfully ran Fidelity Magellan's Fund for years, used to preach buying companies that you know. And that's what our smart contestants have done-they have selected companies they know. And two weeks into the contest, this strategy has proven to be the best buy and hold strategy of the year. We'll see what the rest of the year brings...but we expect more brains to go along with the beauty.



To: Gottfried who wrote (17265)1/18/2006 5:02:39 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25522
 
LRCX beat estimates by 16 cents and is up almost $2 in AH

Message 22074786



To: Gottfried who wrote (17265)1/18/2006 5:18:22 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Respond to of 25522
 
4:56PM Lam Research beats on top and bottom lines (LRCX) 38.32 +0.70 : Reports Q2 (Dec) earnings of $0.55 per share, $0.17 better than the Reuters Estimates consensus of $0.38; revenues rose 11.6% year/year to $358.2 mln vs the $342.7 mln consensus. New orders recorded in backlog increased 24 percent sequentially to $403 mln.