SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: redfrecknj who wrote (50272)1/19/2006 2:50:43 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 110194
 
Notice the keyword in that article - "STATE"
Is Al-Qaeda a state or from a state?

If any "state" sponsored an attack against the US I might want to blow up a country too.

But what if a person from Saudi Arabia attacks the US, does that give ANYONE the right to bomb Pakistanis? If we kill innocent Pakistanis in the process why should it give Pakistan the right to nuke the whitehouse in response?

If a US Citizen wanted DC to be bombed would all one have to do is blow up a bridge in France? Somehow I think not.

IMO France was talking state to state action against state sponsored attacks. If they were not talking about state to stste actions then they are as stupid as Bush.

Mish



To: redfrecknj who wrote (50272)1/19/2006 4:36:01 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Respond to of 110194
 
The Force de Frappe remains operable. I don't understand why France, England, China, Russia, Israel, India and Pakistan can be trusted to behave responsibly with nuclear weapons, but no other country can. And only one country has ever actually used nuclear weapons, and we are the most hypocritical.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News