SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (9387)1/21/2006 10:27:48 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 541280
 
Why should those with a family business or farm get to keep it going in perpetuity, but the heirs of a salaried worker get nothing from the former career?

You're framing it as an issue of fairness. I did not address the fairness aspect, only the practical one, as I clearly stated.

>>I wonder about the practicality<<

I will make one observation on the fairness aspect. Say that great grandpa Picasso painted a picture of your mother as a child and you have loved that painting all your life. It has enormous sentimental value. Do you think it's fair that you should have to give it up because Picasso was famous and the painting has a high market value.

Say that your dad came up with the world's best burger and had a restaurant in the old neighborhood all is life. Say you have to shut it down because you can't find a buyer since it's a low earning business and you can't afford the taxes, either. Do you think that's fair to the neighborhood? To its employees?

Perhaps you have some thoughts on the practicality aspect...



To: TigerPaw who wrote (9387)1/21/2006 6:58:35 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541280
 
Who are you to try to claim any fruits on someone else's labor? Did the salaried guy/gal save his/her money? If they did, and then died, then they would have an estate.

IF the salaried person had money to put into his/her own business, worked extra hours to build that business, paid all the taxes required, hired people and contributed taxes and benefits for them as well, still working his salaried job, then dies.....why should anyone else take advantage of this persons efforts to try to build capital for his descendants?



To: TigerPaw who wrote (9387)1/23/2006 4:57:01 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541280
 

Why should those with a family business or farm get to keep it going in perpetuity, but the heirs of a salaried worker get nothing from the former career?


The heirs of a salaried worker do not continue to get the salary because there is no continuing salary. Similarly the heirs to owner of a company that has gone bust get nothing from the company.

Tim