SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Raymond who wrote (49764)1/22/2006 1:36:58 PM
From: slacker711  Respond to of 197037
 
Ericsson is not in the CDMA infra business any more.

Sorry, I meant both CDMA and WCDMA in that context.

I guess that Ericsson has a rather strong hand when they negotiate agreements.

Nokia and Motorola can claim the same type of bargaining power. Between them, they make up nearly 50% of the WCDMA handset market....and yet the royalties keep flowing in and the royalty percentage still looks to be above 4%. I'm not saying that everybody is paying 5% and above, but I dont think anybody is paying much below 4%.

As I have said in other arguments that have gone on years to long....all of this speculation might have made sense years ago, but we actually have data now. If the percentage slides as WCDMA makes up a greater share of the royalties, I'll admit I was wrong....but until then, the facts are on Q's side.

Slacker



To: Raymond who wrote (49764)1/22/2006 1:38:42 PM
From: Quincy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197037
 
Qualcomm provides IPR and sells chips. GSM integration only exists because handset makers demanded it.

Q's GSM integration helps Ericsson expand the market for their infastructure. Problem is it enables small companies to jump into the lucrative WCDMA handset market and compete handily against those 6 companies.