Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (9461)	1/23/2006 1:10:05 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541933

So? Dowd never urged invading the ME and converting them to Christianity (or ever championed any other idea quite so nutty). Coulter has been completely irresponsible several times- and is, quite frankly, a vicious kook. Dowd is extremely partisan, but stops short of advocating things that would cause wars and mayhem. You may not see the difference between the two of them, but I think many people do, so your point, isn't a point, imo- and in fact, it's rather sad that THAT many people on SI are "fans" of a woman like Coulter who advocates such crazy things. Why should they tie with a woman like Dowd, who is partisan, yet responsible enough not to advocate violence? You don't see the difference, really? You don't think it's a terrible thing that someone who advocated that kind of violence (invading the ME and converting them by force) would have the same size following as someone like Dowd? Pretty terribly thing- imo. Coulter should be as marginalized as the KKK- that she isn't, is a travesty.