SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DMaA who wrote (155504)1/23/2006 10:34:44 AM
From: slacker711  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793731
 
Right, make the tax code even more complicated.

I hate the complexity of the tax code....but I'm willing to sacrifice that principle if it means reducing the effects of oil on our foreign policy.

I notice quite a few conservative/libertarians on this thread dont have a problem with the NSA spying because their national security concerns trump their privacy concerns. It seems to me that a more complex tax code is less of a sacrifice than allowing the NSA to spy domestically.

Slacker



To: DMaA who wrote (155504)1/23/2006 10:35:49 AM
From: Triffin  Respond to of 793731
 
Well, we need a plan of transition .. especially for
liquid fuels for transportation and home heating ( where
the 'shortage' will be ) .. At present rates of consumption
(ie 30.5 Billion barrels crude per year ) and +1.6% per year
demand growth .. we blow thru the next 1 trillion barrels
by 2031 or by 2041 with no demand growth ..

If we commit to a nuclear build-out for baseload power,
then the remaining oil supplies would support a transition
to GTL or CTL for transport fuels ( though an all electric
transportation grid makes the most sense to me ) .. This
approach would also address the concerns of the Global
Warming crowd as we phase out coal fired steam plants ..

Attempting to maintain the energy status quo will only
guarantee a future hard crash ..

Triff ..

biz.yahoo.com