Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (9573)	1/23/2006 7:13:24 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541673

but an enterprise open to the public must also be differentiated from a private place, like your home. In general I disagree. The disagreement may not be total, the particulars of the situation have to be considered but I don't consider a place like a bar or club to be essentially different in basic nature (at least in a way that is relevant to this issue) than a person's large private house when they annouce a party and say "everyone's invited" out lout in public or in an add or something. The former must allow all comers to enter even if it doesn't need to invite or satisfy all potential comers. I don't see a good reason why the former loses his rights over his property. She's saying that if she cannot enter due to health risks, she's effectively being denied the liberty to enter. If she is alergic to cats is her liberty assaulted by the fact that there is a car in my house? (Or in a bar or club for that matter?) Tim