SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Makin' money honey -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sandintoes who wrote (1990)1/24/2006 6:54:47 PM
From: stock leader  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2260
 
that's not what i meant. i meant WTC buildings were not built for safety in terms of escape alternatives (ladders, ropes, anything,etc.) (sorta how apartment buildings have fire escapes) also there were no safety supplies inside like parachutes, etc.

so in other words, safety officials consider the chance of such events as very remote therefore they don't provide the resources to handle such an event. but i think they should (especially in the WTC since it had already been bombed in 1993)



To: sandintoes who wrote (1990)1/25/2006 5:59:16 PM
From: stock leader  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2260
 
ILI has quietly doubled in value in the last 2 months. I wonder what the heck is going on there? It has no revenues and trades wildly above book value so there is very much anticipation in that one.