To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (51418 ) 1/25/2006 5:38:30 PM From: shades Respond to of 110194 =DJ Freddie Mac Steps Up Defense Of Portfolio Management . By Allison Bisbey Colter of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Freddie Mac (FRE) Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Richard Syron has long argued that the company's mortgage-bond portfolio is conservatively managed. Winding it down would only further concentrate risk in the U.S. financial system because these securities would end up in the portfolios of some of the country's largest banks, he has argued. On Tuesday night, he took both of these arguments a step further, saying Freddie is in a better position than banks to manage the portfolio risk because it funds more of its mortgage bond purchases by issuing callable debt. "People argue that there's too much concentration of risk (in our portfolio), but with callable debt we disperse some of the convexity risk, so it's more widely distributed with us than without us," he said in a speech delivered at a meeting of the Money Marketeers in New York. Critics, including members of the Bush Administration, outgoing Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and incoming Fed chief Ben Bernanke, are calling for strict limits on the amount of mortgage bonds Freddie and rival housing agency Fannie Mae (FNM) can hold. They argue that there's too much risk concentrated in the companies' portfolios. But Syron said Freddie effectively outsources the portfolio's sensitivity to changes in interest rates by funding its purchases through the sale of bonds that can be redeemed before they mature. That's because when interest rates on mortgages fall, prompting homeowners to refinance, the housing agency can buy back bonds with higher coupons and issue new bonds with lower coupons. Syron elaborated, saying Freddie has placed its unsecured debt with over 1,000 institutional investors, many of whom cannot purchase derivative instruments, and so are unlikely to buy mortgage bonds. Freddie and Fannie are among the biggest issuers of callable debt in the world, and, through their work with the Bond Market Association, are largely responsible for promoting liquidity in the secondary market by standardizing pricing conventions. Both companies have increased their reliance on callable debt to hedge their portfolio risk after run-ins with regulators over the way they accounted for interest-rate derivatives. "Thanks mainly to our development of the callable debt market, we've been able to reduce our derivative balances to a notional exposure of some $700 billion as of year end 2005," Syron said. By comparison, he said the notional exposure of three of the largest U.S. depositories totaled more than $88 trillion at the end of September. Syron said Freddie currently hedges about 50% of the portfolio's sensitivity to changes in interest rates, or convexity risk, through the callable debt market. It has about $250 billion of callable debt outstanding. By comparison, he said, the top five U.S. banks fund less than 10% of their balance sheets with callable debt. "We don't have to rely on the derivatives market to hedge, the CEO said. "We're the only ones who do it. He said that, in a perfect world, Freddie would hedge each 30-year fixed-rate mortgage in its portfolio with corresponding callable debt - effectively giving the company a "matched book." But demand for callable debt waxes and wanes. For much of 2005, Freddie found it difficult to issue large chunks without offering investors a big price concession. Partly as a result, the company has been issuing more callable debt in smaller denominations through a process known as reverse inquiry, in which investors can request specific terms such as coupons, maturities or the timing and frequency of call dates. Offering this level of customization allows Freddie to borrow more cheaply. Syron said that, despite these limitations, Freddie has been able to manage its interest-rate exposure effectively during periods of high volatility. For example, during the refinancing boom of 2003, when half of the housing agency's mortgage holdings prepaid, it was able to maintain the interest-rate sensitivity of the portfolio at low levels by refinanced much of its debt. Greenspan, for one, hasn't criticized Freddie's track record. The central bank chief has said he's more concerned about whether the company can be relied upon to manage it in the future. He's also said there would be little impact in winding down Freddie and Fannie's retained portfolios, since investors who currently buy the housing agencies' debt would simply substitute mortgage bonds. But Syron doesn't think agency debt and mortgage bonds are perfect substitutes. And even if they were, he doesn't think investors would necessarily reallocate all of the money currently invested in agency debt to mortgage bonds. "Fixed income managers operate against a benchmark that includes a representative allocation of each sector," the CEO said in the prepared version of his remarks. "If GSE (government-sponsored enterprise) debt were eliminated, these investors would probably reallocate their funds in a way that replicates the benchmark of available securities, meaning that mortgage bonds would be the net loser." Freddie estimates that this would result in a net disinvestment from the U.S. mortgage market approaching $1 trillion. "The only way to reduce this disinvestment would be to materially increase the yields paid to investors for buying mortgages," Syron said.