Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (185349)	1/26/2006 2:51:34 PM
From: dougSF30	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Edit: Joe, I was talking about the prototype QC part. I think it likely this is a 90nm part, based on Charlie's claims of private demos in 2005. Whether they end up selling any of those, or make the production QC part one of the first 65nm deliveries is a different question. Of course, if we trust that Fabtech report from a few days back, the Fab36 "90nm" parts use the 65nm process components to a large extent (nickel silicide, SiGe strain, 4th gen low-k stack, maybe also smaller gate dimensions?) even if the overall layout is at a 90nm scale. investorshub.com Meaning there might not be that much of a "resource split" involved...