SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: westpacific who wrote (51626)1/26/2006 5:15:48 PM
From: shades  Respond to of 110194
 
=DJ Global Govt Borrowing Estimated at $5.6 Tln In '06 - S&P

.
By Steven C. Johnson
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES


NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--National, regional and local governments will issue $5.6 trillion in debt in 2006, with the U.S. expected to be the largest issuer, according to estimates released Thursday by Standard & Poor's.

The overall estimate for 2006 represents little change from the prior year, the ratings agency said. Borrowing is expected to fall slightly among governments in the Group of Seven leading industrialized nations due to a lessening trend in budget deficits, while emerging market issuance is expected to slide by 7%.

Certain governments in the Middle East, Africa, Latin America and Asia/Pacific excluding Japan, however, are expected to issue more debt.

The U.S. will top the list of issuers with an estimated $1.87 trillion in medium and long-term debt, S&P said, representing 34% of global gross government borrowing. Of that amount, the federal government is expected to borrow $1.47 trillion and state and local governments $400 billion.

U.S. gross borrowing needs will surpass that of Japan and Europe as a whole, S&P said, which are forecast to account for 30% and 24% of total global gross borrowing.

A widening fiscal deficit in the U.S. and higher spending to rebuild the hurricane-ravaged Gulf coast will account for much of the Federal government's increased borrowing needs, which S&P estimates will rise 14% to $364 billion in 2006.

But John Chambers, chairman of the S&P sovereign ratings committee, noted that overall U.S. issuance will be "essentially unchanged" from 2005 since it will be more "contained by greater reliance on short-term debt compared with 2005 and by the forecasted broad budget balance of American state and local governments."

The risk to the U.S. forecast lies in softer-than-expected economic growth, Chambers said.

"Growth may disappoint should real interest rates rise, oil prices increase further, or if there are other external shocks," he said. "Lower growth would hurt revenue collection and increase the borrowing requirement."

Risk on the expenditure side is tied to the expenses connected to the Iraq war and the cost of the government's new prescription drug plan.

S&P estimates municipal market issuance in 2006 of about $400 billion, little changed from $408 billion in 2005.

On a global basis, borrowing by G7 countries, which currently accounts for 79% of the total, is expected to fall slightly, S&P said.

Total debt stock among sovereign nations continues to grow most rapidly in Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, S&P said. More moderate growth is expected in Japan, although its debt stock remains the largest of any individual sovereign at $7.2 trillion.

The G7 nations are the U.S., U.K., Canada, France, Italy, Germany and Japan.
-By Steven C. Johnson, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-2018; steven.johnson@dowjones.com



To: westpacific who wrote (51626)1/26/2006 5:16:23 PM
From: shades  Respond to of 110194
 
Yah, the philster says they are supporting it big time - the seven swines he calls the big banks - hehe.



To: westpacific who wrote (51626)1/26/2006 5:17:18 PM
From: shades  Respond to of 110194
 
=DJ OFF THE RUN: Supply Surge The Antidote For Low Yields?

.
By Steven C. Johnson
A DOW JONES NEWSWIRES COLUMN


NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--For Treasury investors, 2006 may prove a year for strong stomachs.

An expected widening of the fiscal budget gap and a slew of maturing notes and bonds all but guarantee a deluge of new supply this year to meet the government's cash needs.

That could cause some market indigestion, analysts say, and possibly push long-term rates higher across the curve.

"I don't think it will be enough to force the 30-year bond up 200 basis points, but it will result in a gradual increase across the curve," said Gina Martin, financial economist at Wachovia Securities in Charlotte, N.C.

That would reverse the bewildering trend seen over the last year in which yields on the back end remained stubbornly low despite a steady rise in short-term rates.

"We're going to see an increase in supply, no question, and that means prices down and yields up," said Gary Pollack, managing director at Deutsche Bank Private Wealth Management in New York.

A pivotal Federal Open Market Committee meeting on Jan. 31 that investors hope will provide clear signs about the future course of short-term rates and key data on economic growth make the weeks ahead even more crucial for the market.

Supply Surge


In a research report dated Jan. 25, analysts at UBS in Stamford, Conn. estimate Treasury will have to raise $800 billion in fiscal year 2006 - $175 billion in the first quarter alone.

Some $49 billion will come in next month's quarterly refunding, spread out across three-, 10- and 30-year debt, UBS estimates.

The Bond Market Association, which represents the interests of fixed-income investors, said Wednesday that respondents in a recent survey are projecting the Treasury to sell $169 billion in debt during the first three months of the year.

Indeed, Wednesday's sale of $22 billion in two-year notes pushed yields up across the curve, moving both the two- and 10-year yields to multi-week highs.

And borrowing needs aren't likely to lighten as the year wears on. The government has said it expects its fiscal deficit to widen this year after narrowing a bit in 2005, partly the result of spending increases tied to rebuilding along the Gulf coast; UBS expects a $55 billion deterioration.

Also, a sharp rise in redemptions - UBS estimates some $450 billion in notes and bonds will mature in this fiscal year - will heap further pressure on Treasury to secure new sources of funding.

Another key factor: an expected decline in municipal refundings. When state and local governments refinance outstanding debt, they typically buy custom-made Treasurys, known as SLGS, and use the income to pay off old bonds.

This decreases Treasury's own funding needs by reducing the amount of debt it must sell. Deutsche's Pollack said refinancing activity in 2005 was robust, clocking in at roughly $130 billion.

But since local governments can only refinance outstanding debt once, this activity is expected to fall off in 2006, putting a greater onus on Treasury to raise money.

All of that could offset the trend of low yields and a flat to inverted yield curve, which economists have blamed on myriad culprits, from heavy overseas Treasury buying to central bank transparency and export-led growth by emerging market economies like China, which soak up excess inflation by flooding global markets with cheap goods.

"Supply could very well be the factor that drives rates higher, and it's certainly not a small factor, but - and this is a big 'but' - if the U.S. economy slows in the coming year," all bets are off, said Mary Ann Hurley, vice president of fixed income trading at D.A. Davidson in Seattle.

Indeed, economists are predicting slower U.S. growth in 2006, and if that causes the Fed to end the monetary tightening campaign it began in mid-2004, investors will likely flock to bonds and offset the supply-related pressure on yields.

Put another way: "Overall, Fed policy and where the economy is going is the overriding factor that will drive where interest rates are headed," Hurley said.

One thing that could slow the economy and stay the Fed's hand sooner rather than later is a slowdown in the U.S. housing market and the damping effect it's expected to have on consumer spending, she said.

Different This Time


But some insist 2006 is likely to be the year of at least slightly higher rates. Martin said Wachovia is forecasting a yield of 5% on the 30-year Treasury bond by year end from the current 4.65%.

And "I certainly don't think we're looking at a scenario where the 10-year note is trading at 4.40% again at the end of the year," she added, referring to the note's 2005 year-end level.

The 10-year note opened 2005 yielding 4.21% and closed less than 20 basis points higher, despite a Fed tightening campaign that pushed the overnight fed funds rate up 200 basis points over the course of those 12 months. It's currently yielding 4.48%.

Martin said a surge in new supply will give investors a chance to trade away from the benchmark 10-year note toward other securities. And the first 30-year bond auction since 2001, slated for Feb. 9, could prompt a shift away from the 10-year note as well, especially by pension fund mangers to whom the new longer bonds will appeal as a safe and long-duration investment, she said.

Futures markets widely expect the Fed to raise short term rates for the 14th straight time on Jan. 31 from 4.25% to 4.50%, but opinion after that is split.

In any case, many investors have noted that even one more move will probably result in the Treasury curve from short-term bills to 10-year notes trading below the overnight lending rate.

This would create an uncomfortable and rare situation known as "negative carry," meaning that borrowing short-term funds will cost more than those funds, reinvested in long-term Treasurys, will return. In the past, that has only happened when the Fed was on the verge of cutting rates.

"While it is difficult to maintain this view, we continue to think that carry dynamics will ultimately push rates higher," bond strategists at UBS wrote in a research note Wednesday. "We are not among those who think the Fed will go 'too far' in its tightening cycle, and we certainly don't believe they have already done so."

Rather, UBS is calling for a pause after Jan. 31.

Respondents to a Bond Market Association survey expect the 10-year yield to rise to 4.75% by the end of the quarter, with a two-year note yield keeping pace and rising to 4.70% from 4.46% Wednesday.



To: westpacific who wrote (51626)1/26/2006 5:17:42 PM
From: shades  Respond to of 110194
 
J British Property Federation To Seek Flexibility On REITs

LONDON (Dow Jones)--The British Property Federation will Friday ask the U.K. Treasury for a grace period before applying a 10% limit to shareholdings in companies that convert to Real Estate Investment Trusts.

The request will be presented along with other suggestions from the industry body and property companies at the end of a consultation period before REIT legislation is finalized in the 2006 budget bill to be presented to Parliament in March.

The BPF will say that the grace period, likely around five years, is needed to allow companies to change their shareholder structures to meet the rule, which is designed to prevent offshore companies from claiming exemption from withholding tax on dividends from a REIT.

The U.K. government has stipulated that REITs must at least be tax-neutral for the Treasury.

Gareth Lewis, director of finance at the BPF, said that for property companies considering conversion to REIT status "there's no doubt having that rule in there is a significant impediment," but acknowledged that it will be difficult to avoid its inclusion in the final bill.

He said the BPF will ask for "clarity on how to apply the 10% rule," such as whether it should be applied only after an initial public offering and for it to apply only to certain classes of investors, such as companies that invest directly in the REIT rather than through investment funds.

Lewis said the BPF will also ask for an alternative to the 2.5 times interest cover rule, which has raised industry hackles because it restricts the amount of debt that REITs may hold to levels far lower than in other REIT markets.

"We're looking for a more flexible set of restrictions," he said, such as an alternative loan-to-value borrowing limit test or an exemption for investment grade-rated debt held by a REIT.