Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (10125)	1/27/2006 9:23:02 PM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 542169

Conversations with Daniel Ellsberg, Part 4 dailykos.com

To: neolib who wrote (10125)	1/29/2006 9:02:44 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542169

I mentioned the wages because Tigerpaw seemed to have a problem with the idea of the income that a wage earner has not continueing after death. If wages don't need any special attention or distiction along the lines of one of Tigerpaw's plans than much of this conversation loses its point. In any case a big chunk of most people's income is from wages and they normally don't continue after death. Some other forms of income might not either. If your not following up on Tigerpaw's ideas but rather trying to take the conversation in a different direction can you tell me what it is? What is the idea your supporting? More trading of income streams? What is the specific reason this idea or whatever other idea you are focused on should happen, IYO?