Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: loantech who wrote (5539)	1/28/2006 2:35:20 PM
From: jackjc	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78409

Tom: Lightening on the others, maybe.......... But MMGG has Jason on the case and you know what that means. I can hear their hooves in the distance.....................

To: loantech who wrote (5539)	1/28/2006 10:17:39 PM
From: zoo york	Respond to of 78409

Hi Tom! I like to take some profits off the table in stocks that have strong upside moves, but I always plow that right back into the sector, so in effect I remain fully invested. While it is true that I leave some dollars on the table by selling down to my free shares too early, it is also true that approach has allowed me to rotate capital into many juniors and build a PF of many promising juniors. I like to have many irons in the fire, and my research has always presented me with several companies that I believe are excellent prospects, so I have no shortage of choices to rotate capital into. Since I believe we are still early in the PM bull market, I would rather accumulate many positions in stocks that are zero cost, than to continue to ride a handfull of good stocks higher. Anyway, to answer your question regarding suggestions, here is the link to a post of my top 5 choices for 2006. I think you know most of them already, and yes, CSG is one of them. smartinvestment.ca Scroll to the start of the thread for the picks. cheers! COACH247

To: loantech who wrote (5539)	1/28/2006 11:32:43 PM
From: mailcat8	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78409

Regarding CAU: this is a pure political play--gambling on politics, legislation, and court decisions. Last hear I loaded up with 200,000 shares early enough get long-term capital gains tax treatment--figured that if a referendum they had on the ballot were to pass I'd have about $3,000,000. I figured the odds were about 60-40 inclined towards a favorable vote. Figured that Montana was a poor state sparsely populated where the people would vote for an industry which would provide jobs and related growth. WRONG! It went 60-40 the other way. There has been a fundamental change in the population and political stance of Montana--Montana is now dominated by transplanted west-coast greenie tree-huggers to whom "cyanide-heap-leach-mining" seemed to sound like a crime not far removed from pedophilia. It was one hell of a disappointment, but investment-wise I still came out okay--made a nice chunk by defensive selling prior to the election when the polls were predicting the bad outcome. CAU does have some other mining stuff going on and may be able to survive on that income--but I'd say don't waste your time on CAU unless you can see how the state government will allow them to do cyanide-heap-leaching on their major property.

To: loantech who wrote (5539)	1/31/2006 12:20:34 AM
From: imwim	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78409

<Anyone look at PAT.V. or SWC.V?> Hi Tom, I just switched my POM to SWC. To me the reasons for switching: 1)the funds are for base metal 2)a nice and quick 50% gain from POM, and technicals showed well overbought for short-term; while short-term chart showed SWC should be more powful 3)as for fundamentals on SWC: the good thing is the project is in Canada and moving to production, the only negative I could remember, seems too many papers were issued when they took over the project and for some reason more papers will be issued. If you don't mind, What made you put your head into SWC?