Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_urchin who wrote (12312)	1/29/2006 1:50:11 PM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

RE: "I would say the development is interesting if only because it enables the presentation of what we already know in a form which may be considered more "respectable"." IMO, the RICO suit against Bush is more likely to be considered "respectable" than anything Jones tries to put together. 911forthetruth.com And, is more likely to get media attention in spite of the to date black listed approach of the press to the subject. I don't think I've made any secret of the fact that I consider Jones to be a poseur and that he is so hopelessly behind the learning curve as to be totally incompetent in discussing the issues related to 9/11. He's still basically just paroting things he's found on the Internet, which generally only serves to elicit comments about black helicopters and tin foil hats. So, he's gone from his disasterous interview of some months back where he was afraid to implicate the Bush Crime Family in the attacks, to suggesting that maybe the Bush Crime Family knew the attacks were coming, but didn't do anything about it. Never the less, his own endoresment of the controlled demolition nature of the building implosions pretty well refutes any notion the attacks were anything other than a fully state sponsored act of terror. There's a huge gap between standing on the sidelines while 19 goofballs steal some planes, and, the planting of explosives to bring down 3 skyscrapers in controlled demolitions. The first is far fetched in light of the derailed investigations and the level of intervention used to prevent a military response to the attacks. The second is an air tight alibi for the alleged 19 goofballs, proving someone else was behind the attacks and that the someone had access to resources totally beyond those of free lance terrorists.