SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dennis Roth who wrote (58184)4/4/2006 7:02:18 AM
From: Dennis Roth  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 206085
 
US R&M--ConocoPhillips preferred over R&Ms for refining exposure - Goldman Sachs - April 03, 2006

While we remain bullish on the outlook for US refining markets in 2006, we believe that the integrated oils?and in particular ConocoPhillips?offer a more compelling risk/reward opportunity for investing in the refining cycle than do the independent R&Ms. We see an 18% arbitrage opportunity between Conoco and Valero assuming equal EV/DACF multiples for R&M assets. On an absolute basis, we estimate 32% upside potential to an $84 'traditional' peak value for Conoco. After a period of Not Rated, we are reinstating our investment opinion on Conoco with an Outperform rating and in turn lowering our rating on Valero Energy to In-Line, both in the context of our Attractive coverage view. While we are comfortable owning Conoco shares outright, we believe a structured trade could also make sense for investors less bullish on Conoco's non-refining exposures. Valero remains our favorite pure-play R&M.

Please see our detailed 17-page report, "US R&M: COP preferred over R&Ms for refining exposure." If you are on our e-mail distribution list, a .pdf will be sent today.

Independent R&Ms re-rated up; will the integrateds' R&M valuations follow? We believe that there is a large valuation gap between the independent R&Ms and the implied R&M valuation for the integrated oils. Although to a certain extent it is logical that pure-play refiners could garner some valuation premium during an up-cycle given that they represent "cleaner" downstream exposure, we believe that the gap has widened to such an extent that the risk/reward overwhelmingly favors the integrated oils.

Conoco's refining assets deserve "bellwether" R&M valuation multiple, in our view We believe that ConocoPhillips' refining assets reflect those of a "bellwether" US refiner given its geographically diverse base, medium- to high-conversion capacity, track record of execution, and limited retail marketing exposure. Yet we estimate Conoco overall to be trading at 4.8X 2007E EV/DACF (enterprise value to debt-adjusted cash flow) and an implied R&M 2007E EV/DACF of 3.1X. This compares to the independent R&M average of 6.3X and Valero's 5.7X.

To the extent investors do not wish to be exposed to any of Conoco's non-R&M business segments, we believe that a structured trade could make sense. Potential hedges against long Conoco shares would be a combination of Valero shares, a basket of domestic oils/large-cap E&Ps, and Lukoil (U/A, covered by Michele della Vigna). For every $1 of long Conoco position, we estimate an investor would want to be hedged with $0.45 of a basket of E&P companies, $0.15 of Valero, and $0.05 of Lukoil.

Although the implications of pure-play R&M valuations would be positive for other super-cap oils and domestic integrateds, we believe that a combination of an international asset base, marketing/retail exposure, and lack of geographical diversity within the United States obfuscates the comparability. Having said that, we believe that shares of Amerada Hess (IL/A), Marathon Oil (U/A), and Murphy Oil (OP/A) could also be beneficiaries of investors attributing pure-play refinery valuations to the integrateds' R&M asset base. COP valuation: 18% arbitrage to VLO multiples, 32% upside to traditional peak Assuming Valero's cash flow multiple for Conoco's R&M assets, we see 18% upside potential to $77 per share. On an absolute basis, we see 32% upside to an $84 "traditional" peak value for Conoco. Our "traditional" peak valuations are based on a $45 per barrel long-term WTI oil and price commensurate other commodity price assumptions.

Valero remains our favorite R&M pure-play company For investors who do not care for Conoco's non-refining businesses or a structured trade that could hedge unwanted exposure, Valero remains our favorite R&M pure-play company given its "bellwether" status, high conversion capacity, track-record of acquisition integration, and strong management team. Our downgrade of Valero to In-Line from Outperform is not driven by a less favorable view of Valero, but rather the superior relative opportunity we see in Conoco shares at this time. We see 2% upside to a $61 "traditional" peak value and 39% upside to an $84 super-spike-adjusted peak value.

Key catalysts Catalysts for Conoco shares include improved investor sentiment toward the sector, delivery of major E&P projects and production targets, including the acquired Burlington properties, and the use of free cash flow to pay down debt. We do not believe that management would consider spinning off its refining business as we think that management can add significant value to shareholders over the medium to long term as an integrated company.

Catalysts for the overall refining sector are lower refined product imports, potential supply disruptions given the various product specification changes in the United States, and continued strength in product demand.

Key risk to owning Conoco over pure-play R&Ms would be E&P disappointments In our view, the key risks to owning Conoco (or other integrateds) in lieu of pure-play R&Ms would be any negative developments in its non-refining businesses. Disappointment with Conoco's E&P projects, misses to its E&P production profile, or concerns with the acquisition of Burlington could all drive underperformance in its shares vis-a-vis pure-play R&Ms. On the other hand, we think these risks are known to investors and actually appear to be driving the current discounted valuation.

In addition, a further material ratcheting up of expectations for long-term refining margins could favor the pure-plays. However, if investors were to increase long-term refining margin expectations, we would be surprised if the same did not occur for crude oil and US natural gas prices to the benefit of ConocoPhillips.

Finally, our 1Q 2006 EPS forecast of $2.30 for Conoco is below the $2.45 First Call consensus expectation. As we have written previously, actual 1Q commodity prices are on track to come in below original expectations. A sensitivity analysis based on preliminary 1Q prices would point to 1Q EPS of $2.10-$2.20 for Conoco, but we will wait for final pricing, as usual, before reviewing our estimates. Based on our bullish 2H 2006 and 2007 commodity outlook, our full-year 2006 and 2007 forecasts are currently (and likely to remain) higher than consensus.

Each of the analysts named below hereby certifies that, with respect to each subject company and its securities for which the analyst is responsible in this report, (1) all of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect his or her personal views about the subject companies and securities, and (2) no part of his or her compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this report: Arjun Murti, Luis Ahn.



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (58184)5/1/2006 8:59:43 AM
From: Dennis Roth  Respond to of 206085
 
Integrated oil, E&P, R&M trading update - We remain bullish on sector following heart of 1Q2006 earnings season - Goldman Sachs - April 30, 2006

We believe investors should take advantage of the pullback last week to add to positions in the energy sector, as our outlook for the remainder of 2006 and 2007 remains distinctly bullish. We believe Street EPS estimates for 2H2006 and 2007 are too low and will be revised up in coming months/quarters. In addition to upward EPS revisions, we see ROCE for the sector rising again in 2006, in contrast to "doom and gloom" fears of margin compression. We continue to believe we are in year two of what could ultimately be a 4-5 year "super-spike" phase for energy commodity markets, and we reiterate our Attractive coverage view. No change to any of our top picks, with ConocoPhillips' 5% decline last week we think providing a particularly compelling re-entry opportunity for investors.

We would use recent weakness to add to sector - we do not see a repeat of October or February pull-backs happening We do not believe last week's pull-back is forewarning the 15% order-of-magnitude correction we had after the hurricanes last October and again this February following a very warm January. The coincidences cited by some are: (1) strong performance heading into earnings season; (2) earnings not providing an incremental upward catalyst and the group subsequently pulling back; and (3) government officials talking about environment waivers to ease tight gasoline markets.

Key differences in our view: (1) sector currently shows ~20% potential upside to "traditional" peak values consistent with $45/bbl long-term oil versus being closer to traditional peak at time of prior sell-offs; (2) period of $60-plus long-dated oil prices has now lasted more than 10 months, providing greater confidence in $60-plus oil; (3) Street EPS estimates again lag current spot prices versus being closer to spot at time of prior sell-offs. While we have never claimed to be good at ultra-short-term trading, we believe the current pull-back will be shorter-lived and of lesser magnitude than the February 2006 or October 2005 corrections.

2H2006 and 2007 EPS revision risk remains skewed to the upside, in our view We believe integrated oil/E&P/R&M equities are poised to resume an upward march to EPS expectations in 2H2006 after a brief warm-winter pause in 1Q2006. Specifically, using $68/bbl WTI oil in 3Q2006, our EPS estimates are 11% above First Call on average, and with a $70/bbl WTI assumption in 4Q2006 we are 16% above the First Call consensus on average for our universe of integrated oil, E&P, and R&Ms. Finally, on what increasingly appears like a conservative 2007 assumption of $68/bbl WTI oil, we are 30% above the First Call consensus on average (see Exhibit 1).

We expect 2006 ROCE to be up versus 2005, in contrast to "doom and gloom" fears of margin compression We estimate returns on capital employed (ROCE) for the sector will rise to 25% in 2006 from 23% in 2005 and a 1996-2005 average of 14.5% (see Exhibit 2). We believe a continued trend of rising profitability for the sector is in sharp contrast to the "doom and gloom" naysayers calling for margin compression. The combination of rising EPS and rising ROCE we think will lead to rising valuations and stock price performance for the sector.

No change to our top picks, with ConocoPhillips looking particularly attractive following sell-off last week We make no change to our top picks as previously highlighted (see Exhibit 3). Following the pull-back last week, we think the shares of ConocoPhillips look particularly interesting with 27% potential upside to a $84 "traditional" peak value. We thought management did a good job on its conference call outlining the underlying economics on the Burlington Resources acquisition, a point of contention for many investors. ConocoPhillips shares currently trade at just 5.1X 2007E EV/DACF, below both the 5.6X domestic oil/E&P average and below the 6.4X R&M average. Whether viewed as an inexpensive E&P or R&M company, we think ConocoPhillips shares are considerably undervalued.
Key catalysts to closing its valuation gap we think include: (1) continued upward EPS revisions owing to rising commodity prices; (2) delivery of promised production volumes and synergies from Burlington Resources acquisition; (3) use of free cash flow to pay down debt, raise dividends, and buyback stock.

In our April 3, 2006 report, "US R&M: Conoco preferred over R&Ms for refining exposure, Message 22322575 " we highlighted several beta-neutral structured trades that can help capture the potential for a convergence between ConocoPhillips' valuation and that of the independent E&Ps or R&Ms. For investors that do not care for E&P exposure, for example, we estimate that for every $1 long ConocoPhillips that investor could short $0.65 of a basket of E&P companies. Further, for investors willing to take only minimal commodity price risk, we estimate that for every $1 long ConocoPhillips that investor could short $0.45 of a basket of E&Ps and $0.15 of Valero.

Goldman Sachs & Co., and or one of its affiliates, is acting as financial advisor to Apache Corp in the proposed acquisition of BP's producing properties on the Outer Continental Shelf of the Gulf of Mexico. Goldman Sachs & Co., and or one of its affiliates will receive a fee for its financial advisor role.

Investment funds affiliated with The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. have a principal investment in Bill Barrett Corp. (BBG). As a result of its position in BBG securities, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. may be deemed an affiliate of BBG.

Each of the analysts named below hereby certifies that, with respect to each subject company and its securities for which the analyst is responsible in this report, (1) all of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect his or her personal views about the subject companies and securities, and (2) no part of his or her compensation was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this report: Arjun Murti, Brian Singer, Luis Ahn.