SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (270814)1/31/2006 4:09:40 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575598
 
re: Clinton was negligent indeed but that was a mistake. I do not believe that negligence was intentional it is just the attack on US seems so improbable ..... But when you accuse Bush you should realize that lion share of negligence is Clinton's

If Clinton was negligent, Bush was more so. He had more specific info and 9 months is plenty of time, especially since he did nothing wrt terrorism in that 9 months.

I personally don't think either was to blame... but if you are going to throw accusations then Bush is more logical.



To: AK2004 who wrote (270814)1/31/2006 4:41:31 PM
From: Taro  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575598
 
Clinton got too busy working with all his lawyers - some of them on tax payers payrolls - to stay out of the slammer with all his and Hillary's screwy affairs piling up.
Read Freeh for an accurate account.

And of course not having sex with that woman kept his attention busy in his spare time as well ;)

So don't blame him, OK?

Taro


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News