SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bosco & Crossy's stock picks,talk area -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Crossy who wrote (17100)2/2/2006 5:47:16 PM
From: hotlinktuna  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37387
 
Crossy this was sent to me in error from keyners: CROSSY,

SUF: I realize that SULFCO ordered 60 ultrasonic probes in order to complete the manufacturing of their UAE plant units, so they did not get their first commercial order but their manufacturer did, and this news still doesn't prove that their process work.

But why would they have a JV with Fujairah Oil Technology, LLC and two patents and have a technology that doesn't work and in addition to that keep ordering parts to complete their project? Just doesn't make sense to me and still don't understand Barron's article.

The news lends more credibility to the likelihood that sono cracking works, and that someone is comfortable with ramping up production. You don't just go manufacturing expensive sonocrackers if you are bluffing.

CROSSY, what your take on it all? I know you don't have interest in such large market cap but figured you could enlight some of us with your technical expertise and experience. Thank you.



To: Crossy who wrote (17100)2/18/2006 8:47:52 AM
From: AuBug  Respond to of 37387
 
I sure am happy with the large prospective yellowcake land coverage we have in the Athabasca Basin with CVV.v, DJE.v, FDC.v & PXP.v. I sure wish Chuckie Schwab would add a US symbol for PXP.v so I can add some to our IRA accounts. I just added some more FDC.v to my wife's IRA on the last dip.

Did you notice that Casey recommended Consolidated Abaddon Resources (ABN.v) as their choice for another uranium play to go with their JNN.v? If one looks at a claim map of the Athabasca basin and considers who the geological talent is then why would one pick ABN.v before CVV.v, DJE.v, FDC.v & PXP.v? I mean besides the fact that Casey and some of his 12 staffers have loaded up on cheap shares in a PP.

E.g., blow up the claim map and find the Cigar Lake mine in the NE. If being close to Cigar Lake is good then PXP.v is best. If being west of the MacArthur River mine is good then CVV.v claims dwarf ABN.v's claims. The map does make me want to take a look at Northern Continental Resources (NCR.v). I see DJE.v only has a couple of blocks displayed, a small fraction of their land. Hopefully they make sure Intierra Resource Intelligence updates them very soon, like now, before the PDAC meeting next month.

Taken as a whole the yellowcake land coverage of CVV.v, DJE.v, FDC.v & PXP.v is excellent and I'm very confident that we'll hit big with one or two of our juniors. Thanks again for sharing :-)

consolidatedabaddon.com
consolidatedabaddon.com
finance.yahoo.com