Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (61889)	2/2/2006 2:37:53 PM
From: Mao II	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Your assumptions are solipsistic, your conclusions deterministic, your Weltanschauung berift of nuance. But you knew that already. Lets leave Cindy, now out of handcuffs, and Mrs. Young -- they are both more than capable of taking care of themselves.

To: one_less who wrote (61889)	2/2/2006 5:09:59 PM
From: Kevin Rose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Sorry to jump in the middle. I believe that Sheehan believed simply showing up would be enough of a protest, and garner enough attention. To assume that she would do anything 'disruptive', you'd have to also assume that the politician's wife who wore the Support our Troops shirt would jump up in the middle of the speech and break out in 'This Land is Your Land, This Land is My Land'. We don't convict people for crimes they might commit, unless they take some action towards the commitment. Wearing a tshirt is not enough to get anyone convicted of disrupting anything - except in the current atmosphere. I'm not saying that you believe Cindy would have caused a disruption, but I heard Bill Blowhard making such a claim last night on his All Spin Zone.