SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SilentZ who wrote (271571)2/3/2006 9:39:07 AM
From: Road Walker  Respond to of 1575311
 
re: I like 2 and 3 -- I don't like 1, because the only people who are really affected by it in the short term are those who are already financially strapped. It'd also encourage people to drive less, and people driving from place to place really helps our economy; if people drive less, they shop less too.

Yeah, it's not perfect. But I'm thinking that low income folks would buy, say a Toyota Corrola for less than $14K minus the $7K, get combined 35 MPG, and retire old Betsy that gets 18 MPG and make out all right on the gas cost (even with the tax). I guess the payments on even $6K+ with 0% interest could be tough for some people.

We've got to figure a way to retire the inefficient passenger car fleet.

John



To: SilentZ who wrote (271571)2/3/2006 12:24:47 PM
From: Taro  Respond to of 1575311
 
I like all 3 points actually - as long as we make sure that ALL OF THOSE FUNDS - and I mean 100% of that income - are reinvested in developing new energy sources only.

But I make the bet that most of it would be spent on social projects and other popular consumption areas.

Taro