SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (156674)2/4/2006 9:25:39 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 793727
 
Note: There is something, which, IMHO, gives this story a great deal of credibility. If you happened to see any of the committee hearing this week at which Negroponte and Goss testified, right before the hearing ended, Rockefeller made what seemed at the time to be an idiotic statement. He said that he expected that the source of the leaks would turn out to be the Executive Branch...i.e. the White House. Negroponte looked at him like he (Rockefeller) was deranged..It made NO sense to me at the time...but now, with these comments...it makes a lot of sense..he's trying to deflect what he expects is coming his way

What branch is the CIA part of?



To: LindyBill who wrote (156674)2/5/2006 4:36:26 AM
From: KLP  Respond to of 793727
 
This link including notes on Rockefeller may have been lost in the dust of the Holidays....We should re-read these notes from Rush, including thoughts on who the leakers were....

Message 21981411



To: LindyBill who wrote (156674)2/5/2006 5:56:30 AM
From: John Carragher  Respond to of 793727
 
not to indict a US senator esp. on intelligence comm. sends a wrong message to the public and other congressmen.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News