Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (272462)	2/6/2006 2:10:20 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574616

Get a clue, pal. Military weapons should not be in civilian hands. There's nothing in the Constitution guaranteeing military weapons. Just "arms". In those days, all they had beyond muskets were cannons. If the founding fathers had wanted civilians to have military weapons they would have put in that we can all own cannons. I realize gun collectors get hard-ons for machine-guns and so forth, but it's not safe to let anyone but the military and SWAT team types own them. Those are for professionals only. Kerry would never suggest taking away any weapon used for hunting. You don't need a machine-gun to hunt. If you do, you shouldn't be hunting. Hunting is supposed to be a sport, not a massacre. And as for home defence, the guns on the market now are more than enough firepower.