SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: regli who wrote (45970)2/7/2006 1:21:54 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
China central bank drains record 164 bln yuan in open market operations
Tuesday, February 7, 2006 5:39:32 AM
afxpress.com

BEIJING (AFX) - The People's Bank of China said it drained a total of 164 bln yuan from the banking system via the sale of bank bills and repurchase agreements, setting a new record for a single day's open market operations

In a statement carried on its website, the central bank said it sold 120 bln yuan in one-year bills with a yield of 1.8330 pct, slightly lower than the yield of 1.8537 pct in a similar sale on Jan 17

The central bank also drained 44 bln yuan in 7-day repos, with the yield at 1.55 pct

The major liquidity tightening exercise follows a run of record daily withdrawals of funds from the system through the issuance of bank bills and repurchase agreements

The previous high saw the central bank issue 95 bln yuan in one-year bills on Jan 10

The central bank temporarily eased its tightening moves before the Lunar New Year, when it bought 14-day repos from the banks to cover them for customer draw-downs over the holidays

Those repos also mature today, reversing the flow of funds to the lenders and returning it to the central bank, according to Xinhua

Xinhua projected a resumption and possible strengthening in the PBOC's sterilization efforts. "The big move to drain liquidity from the market may be just the beginning for the central bank," it said

Broad M2 money supply accelerated through 2005, supported by a surge in trade earnings, steady foreign direct investment, and speculative flows betting on a further appreciation of the Chinese currency

In response, the central bank, which officially pursues a "prudent" monetary policy, has become more aggressive about soaking up the extra funds rather than risk poor lending decisions by cash-rich state banks and overheating in sectors such as real estate

The central bank paused its sterilization campaign only briefly late last year when it suspended the issuance of three- and six-month bills to allay the concerns of lenders who felt that interbank rates had risen too high too quickly

The PBOC said on Sunday that three-month bill issuances will resume on Thursday but gave no word on future sales of six-month bills. (1 usd = 8.1 yuan)



To: regli who wrote (45970)2/7/2006 1:27:18 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
UK Jan retail sales growth lowest in 11-year survey history - BRC
Tuesday, February 7, 2006 12:16:54 AM
afxpress.com

LONDON (AFX) - The sharp pick-up in UK retail sales over Christmas came to an abrupt halt during January, a leading retailing lobby group said today

In its monthly survey, the British Retail Consortium said like-for-like sales, which strip out the impact of new and closed space, increased by only 0.2 pct from January 2005 against expectations of a 1.5 pct improvement

January's modest increase represents a sharp slowdown from the equivalent 2.6 pct rise recorded in December, and equates to the weakest start to the year since the survey began in 1995

The BRC said much of the fall in the growth rate was due to slowing food sales, though clothing and footwear also dropped back. "After the pre-Christmas upturn, we are now back to the reality of a tough, discount driven retail market," said the BRC's director general Kevin Hawkins. "The squeeze on consumer spending continues unabated," he added. Despite his downbeat comments, today's survey showed that the three-month trend rate of growth improved in January to 1.1 pct from 0.2 pct in December for like-for-like sales, largely because the October decline is stripped out

However, for total sales it slowed to 3.6 pct from 4.1 pct for total sales, which includes all new stores and floor space. On a year-on-year basis, total sales in January were 3.4 pct up on the previous year, down on the 6.2 pct recorded in December



To: regli who wrote (45970)2/7/2006 1:33:43 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
UK manufacturing set to lose another 24,000 jobs in next three months - CBI
Tuesday, February 7, 2006 12:16:42 AM
afxpress.com

LONDON (AFX) - The UK's manufacturing sector looks set to shed another 24,000 jobs in the next three months as output continues to contract, primarily as a result of falling domestic orders, a survey found today

In their quarterly regional trends survey, the Confederation of British Industry, the UK's business lobby group, and credit information services firm Experian noted that the fall in output at a national level in the past three months was despite survey expectations of little change

For the second survey running, they said the overall decline was driven primarily by the weakness of domestic orders, with the drop more severe than expected in most regions. While export orders also remained on a downward path, they noted that the UK-wide fall was modest and there were a number of regions that bucked this trend, such as Yorkshire & the Humber and the East Midlands

"With some notable exceptions, manufacturers continue to experience difficult times, with high energy costs continuing to add pressure to profit margins," said Doug Godden, the CBI's head of economic analysis

"Whilst a reduction in interest rates this month appears unlikely, with inflationary pressures remaining at bay, the Bank of England must stand ready to cut in the months ahead should the nascent economic recovery fail to gain momentum," he added

The survey found that the manufacturing sector, which accounts for around 17 pct of the UK's GDP, continued to shed jobs over the past three months, with the job losses particularly marked in Northern Ireland, the South East & London and the West Midlands

More modest job losses were reported elsewhere, with the exception of Scotland, where employment rose for the third consecutive survey, and the North West where the balance remained broadly unchanged following three years of sustained job cuts. According to Experian estimates based on the survey results, a further 24,000 manufacturing job losses are expected in the current quarter at a national level. Although most regions are set to experience marginal declines in employment compared with the steep losses incurred during the manufacturing recession of 2001-2003, substantial job losses are still predicted in the West Midlands (6,000), which also shows the largest percentage fall in employment (1.6 pct), followed by the South East & London (4,000 job losses). The survey results were taken from the 704 replies to the CBI's quarterly industrial trends survey received between Dec 12 and Jan 11



To: regli who wrote (45970)2/7/2006 1:43:28 AM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Bush proposes $2.77 trillion budget -
Monday, February 6, 2006 9:15:56 PM
afxpress.com

WASHINGTON (AFX) -- President Bush on Monday sent Congress a $2.77 trillion budget request that would boost defense spending, while trimming Medicare and other government programs even as first-term tax cuts are extended

The budget request seeks a 2.3% rise in total government spending in fiscal 2007, which begins Oct. 1. The deficit would total $354 billion

"As this budget shows, we have set clear priorities that meet the most pressing needs of the American people while addressing the long-term challenges that lie ahead," Bush wrote to lawmakers, in a letter accompanying the four-volume, 2,400-page document. "The 2007 budget will ensure that future generations of Americans have the opportunity to live in a nation that is more prosperous and more secure." Democrats criticized the budget outline as misleading and incomplete, complaining that it fails to adequately account for future war-related spending, efforts to shield middle-class taxpayers from the alternative minimum tax, and the long-term effects of extending Bush's first-term tax cuts

The White House, meanwhile, expects the government to end the current fiscal year with a deficit of $423 billion -- a record high in dollar terms

Administration officials say the deficit figure is less onerous when measured as a percentage of the overall economy

"While this increase in the deficit is unwelcome, at 3.2% of GDP, the projected deficit would be well within the historical range and smaller than the deficit in 11 of the last 25 years," White House Office of Management and Budget Director Joshua Bolten told reporters

The Bush plan "explodes deficits, but then conceals them by providing only five years of numbers and leaving out large costs, like long-term [AMT] reform and realistic ongoing war costs.?The result will be more debt passed on to our children," said Sen. Kent Conrad of North Dakota, the senior Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee

Defense boost As previously outlined by administration officials, the White House requested a Defense Department budget of $439.3 billion, up nearly 7% from the $410.8, excluding war-related supplemental spending, in fiscal 2006 outlays. The budget doesn't fully account for expected costs associated with the ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. White House officials last week said war-related supplemental spending would likely top $120 billion in the current fiscal year. They also added a $50 billion "plug number" to the fiscal 2007 estimate, which deputy OMB director Joel Kaplan said would allow the White House to better guess deficit figures

Outside of the Pentagon and other security-related spending, the White House targeted 141 programs for sharp cuts or elimination, in a bid to save $14.5 billion in fiscal 2007. Bush also seeks to cut projected spending on mandatory entitlement programs by $65 billion over five years, with the bulk coming from measures designed to hold down outlays for Medicare, the health-care program for the elderly, by $36 billion through 2011. Mandatory spending refers to programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, in which outlays are set automatically according to the number of beneficiaries and other factors

The White House contends that such cuts will help the administration stay on target for reducing the budget deficit to less than 2.25% of gross domestic product by fiscal 2009

The White House expects the deficit to fall to $354 billion in fiscal 2007, and declining to $208 billion by fiscal 2009. The 2009 figure would be equivalent to 1.4% of GDP, the White House said, leaving Bush on track to meet his goal of cutting the deficit to less than 2.25% of GDP by that date

But budget watchers warned that the administration has a less-than-stellar record when it comes to its deficit projections

The Concord Coalition, a bipartisan group that advocates a balanced federal budget, warned that previous Bush administration budget forecasts have assumed similar improvements in the deficit outlook that have failed to materialize

The White House's 2004 budget, for example, projected a $307 billion shortfall that year declining to around $201 billion in fiscal 2006. Instead, the administration forecasts that red ink in 2006 will be more than twice that amount

Tax battle The administration's five-year forecast assumes that Congress will extend Bush's first-term tax cuts, which are due to expire in coming years

Critics charge that the tax cuts will exacerbate the deficit, while the administration argues that further tax relief will help ensure economic growth

"Many of the administration's critics will argue that we should let the tax relief expire," Bolten said.?"A tax increase is the wrong prescription, not only for the nation's economic health, but also for the government's fiscal health.?We are not an under-taxed society." Federal tax receipts declined for three consecutive years at the beginning of the Bush administration, bottoming out at $1.783 trillion in fiscal 2003, or 16.5% of GDP, and marking the first time receipts fell three years in a row since the 1920s

Tax receipts have bounced back strongly in the last two years amid strong economic growth, edging back up to around 17.5% of GDP in fiscal 2005. The administration forecasts receipts will increase 5.9% annually through 2011

[Total horseshit - We got a rebound because of a one time repatriation of overseas corporate profits. Watch what happens heading into a recession. Mish]

Budget analysts warn that efforts to trim federal spending, always a difficult task, will likely prove even more challenging ahead of the 2006 midterm elections

Bush attempted in last year's budget to eliminate or sharply curtail around 154 programs to eliminate $15.8 billion in spending. In the end, Congress agreed to less than half of the proposed cuts

What's more, the federal budget is set to explode in coming decades as the Baby Boom generation retires, fueling a sharp rise in what is known as entitlement spending, including Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid

But those programs are politically popular, often making even minor cuts difficult to achieve

Bush's budget warns that unsustainable growth in future mandatory spending represents the greatest threat to the nation's long-term fiscal health

"The 2007 budget paves the way for additional reforms that will be needed over the long term to bring Medicare's finances in line with available resources," the budget document said

In 2003, Bush pushed Congress to enact a Medicare prescription drug benefit, which took effect this year. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates net spending for the benefit will rise from $30 billion in the current fiscal year to $155 billion by fiscal 2016

The House last week just barely passed a plan designed to rein in spending on a range of federal benefits programs by $39 billion over the next five years -- an amount equivalent to less than 0.5% of projected federal spending through 2011

[Spending cuts? What a pack of lies - Mish]



To: regli who wrote (45970)2/10/2006 1:55:58 AM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Fed Focus
Paul McCulley | February 2006
The Knack for When and the Gift for How
pimco.com



To: regli who wrote (45970)2/10/2006 2:21:44 AM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Too-good-to-be-true offers leave borrowers in a bind

Second of three parts

The promise of easy money comes in an official-looking envelope marked, "Important Financial Information Enclosed." Need $2.5 million at 1 percent to 2 percent to buy or refinance a home? No problem.
Borrowers put no money down and pay just interest. A good credit rating is not a requirement. Bankruptcy judgments, debt charge-offs or tax liens don't matter, and "all difficult credit scenarios are okay," the lender says.
The home-financing offers come from an army of mortgage brokers estimated at 250,000 nationwide, many operating outside the reach of banking regulators. They have become the principal source of home financing in the United States.
In years past, banks and savings and loans provided most mortgages, but their share of the $2.8 trillion market dwindled to less than half in recent years, according to Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies.
As the role of banks has declined, the share of unconventional mortgages with easy and risky lending terms has exploded -- and now account for more than $650 billion last year, up from $56 billion in 2001, according to the Federal Reserve. Most of that growth occurred since 2003, when the total was $118 billion.
"The mortgage industry of today bears little relationship to the mortgage industry of even the 1990s," said William C. Apgar of the Harvard center.
The number of unscrupulous brokers offering "junk mortgages" has multiplied with the housing boom and advent of Internet financing in the past five years, said David Levine of Mortgage Loan Request, a mortgage information service.
Their advertisements "are designed to hit consumers where they are most susceptible, their wallet."
They are often successful, because many consumers never see or understand the fine print -- often on the back of the flier -- that explains what a bad deal the mortgages can be, he said.
"The sleight of hand is that the low rate advertised is actually adjustable, and it can increase in as little as 30 days' time. You may be paying less every month, but your interest is not being paid up and your loan balance continues to accumulate at an alarming rate," he said.

"Homeowners who think that they may be saving $200 to $300 a month on their payments are actually falling behind by that very same amount" because payment of full principal and interest is being postponed to a later day of reckoning, he said.

No-risk sales
The brokers who offer such mortgages often have no licenses or formal training and may have just recently graduated from high school or college. They are essentially salespeople for whom there is no downside to the risky debt propositions they peddle.
The riskier the mortgages, the bigger their commissions, so they often try to get homeowners to take on the largest mortgage possible with low initial payments and interest rates that can explode in later years.
Some of the loans have abusive terms, such as no annual caps on rate increases and clauses that permit the lender to increase the required monthly mortgage payment at any time.
"Only a limited number of states have laws and regulations in effect to protect borrowers," Mr. Levine said.
Maryland licenses brokers and requires 40 hours of training and a criminal background check, but no training is required in the District or Virginia.
For many buyers trying to stretch their resources to purchase increasingly expensive homes in Washington and other major cities, the risky loans may be the only way they can qualify.
But millions of others take out what seem like easy-money loans so they can splurge on gifts and other lavish purchases.
Brokers encourage frequent refinancing or "churning" of mortgages because that increases their commissions and ensures a stream of future business. That also is why they promote interest-only loans and adjustable-rate mortgages that almost certainly will have to be refinanced in a few years if the borrowers are to avoid punishing increases in their monthly mortgage payments.
Once the brokers close on the loans, they sell them to "wholesalers" who repackage them into pools of mortgages and sell them to private investors, including hedge funds, insurance companies and brokerage houses.
The extraordinarily easy terms on the loans are dictated by the investors, not federal or state regulators who set lending standards for banks, and reflect the seemingly insatiable appetite for the risky but high-yielding debt paper.

Investors step in
All this was made possible by an evolution of the mortgage market away from banks and thrifts, which in years past had to follow conservative credit guidelines laid down by regulators.
The mortgage companies have been able to bypass the regulated banking industry by tapping into a plentiful source of funding for the loans -- private and international investors.
Although the unconventional mortgage securities have not been tested in a financial crisis, many investors still view them as among the safest investments because mortgages are secured by property liens and most borrowers are unwilling to forfeit their homes by going into default.
Brokers and investors argue that they are doing a major service for borrowers by providing them with options they never had before to hold down their monthly payments and buy homes without having to save for a down payment.
As the booming housing market has seemed to ratify the wisdom of lenders and borrowers alike, mortgage "wholesalers" have increasingly loosened their lending terms to take in more marginal borrowers and housing transactions.
It is now routine to approve loans that cover 100 percent or more of a home's value and require up to 60 percent of a borrower's income to make debt payments. Recently, several wholesale lenders announced that they would offer 100 percent loans to people who just emerged from bankruptcy.
Without such easy lending terms, economists say many borrowers with marginal credit could never have purchased homes, and many young, first-time home buyers would not have been able to get into the market.
The mortgage industry has changed because of the growing role played by nonbank mortgage brokers and investors, said Mr. Apgar of the Harvard center.
"The declining importance of bank deposits as a funding source for mortgages has largely driven the structural shift," he said.
In 1990, fewer than half of all mortgages were secured and sold to investors; today, nearly 70 percent of mortgages are funded in the secondary market.
Rather than applying credit standards designed to maintain the soundness of the banking system, today's mortgage brokers have eliminated the old rules and are largely in the business of matching borrowers and investors who are willing to take increasing risks.
The brokers now have inherent conflicts of interest because they maximize their commissions by processing as many loans as possible and have no long-term interest in the performance of loans sold to investors, Mr. Apgar said.
Brokers and real estate agents intent on clinching a home sale and mortgage financing have been known, among other things, to pressure home appraisers to ratify inflated prices on homes in overpriced markets, according to the Chicago-based Appraisal Institute.
"Brokers are immune from the potential adverse consequences of both failing to match the borrower with the best available mortgage and failing to provide accurate data to underwrite the loan," Mr. Apgar said. "Both affect the odds that the loan will default, which can have devastating consequences for the borrower."

washtimes.com