SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: skinowski who wrote (129327)2/9/2006 3:21:57 PM
From: bcrafty  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 209892
 
ski, sometimes "large" traders are a better contrarian indicators than the small guys
Agreed - that's why I don't put any emphasis on the COTs, as I don't know if they're using certain positions as hedges or not. Talk to the people who like to follow the COTS and I'm sure you'll get other opinions, though. I've never understood why COT followers usually ignore the large specs (hedge funds).

But if you're implying that I've got this all wrong and institutions are not, comparatively speaking, and for the purposes of this discussion, generally regarded as the so-called smarter money and we little guys are the dumber money, then (seriously) what group IS generally regarded to be the so called smart money in such discussions?

An answer such as "it's all a myth; there is not an identifiable group generally regarded as the smart money, there should not be such distinctions, and those who imply that there is should find something else to do" is not an available answer. <g>



To: skinowski who wrote (129327)2/9/2006 4:37:42 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw  Respond to of 209892
 
Nothing is cut and dry in this game, otherwise it would be a matter of reading one small textbook, and then go and make millions.

That's the catch - once you have a large enough stake to really rake in the big bucks - you yourself are part of the indicator you're betting against.