SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WAR on Terror. Will it engulf the Entire Middle East? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Richnorth who wrote (12534)2/10/2006 9:54:50 PM
From: Nikole Wollerstein  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32591
 
And Putin invited Hamas liders to political meeting
and new attacks in North Kavkaz
Less than three months after the rebel attack on the city of Nalchik, the capital of the republic of Kabardino-Balkaria in the North Caucasus, the Russian military command has again begun to talk about new rebel attacks.

On January 8, Sergei Topchy, deputy commander of the Russian Interior Forces, told Interfax news agency that the Command of the Interior Forces expect a rebel attack to occur in any of six Caucasian regions or in one of five "zones": Krasnodar Krai, Karachaevo-Cherkessia, Kabardino-Balkaria, North Ossetia and Ingushetia, and Dagestan (Newsru.com, January 8). In other words, the federal agents believe an attack is possible in any part of the North Caucasus.

Topchy said that special reserves totaling 13,000 troops had been formed for each zone to respond quickly to an insurgency offensive in any Caucasian region. The reserves are to deploy to the conflict zone by air or by rail. Topchy mentioned, however, that the primary task of the Interior Forces would be to prevent the attacks by blocking escape routes that rebel groups could use to reach the lowland from the Great Caucasian Range, which runs along the Russian-Azerbaijan and the Russian-Georgian borders. Special mountain units will be set up for this task, and they will coordinate their operations with border guard forces posted in the region.

The Russian generals regard the high mountain areas of the North Caucasus as the rear of the rebels' front (see EDM, August 11, 2004). The mountain forests are the only place where the insurgents can secretly congregate in great numbers, enough to start a large-scale offensive. Their lines of arms supplies and reinforcements also run along the foot of the Caucasian Range. It is clear to the Kremlin that federal agents must control the mountains in order to defeat the rebels. Otherwise, large-scale attacks will be possible anywhere in the North Caucasus.

After the October 13 Nalchik raid, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered additional frontier posts for the mountainous parts of the North Caucasus. For example, seven new frontier posts are designated for Kabardino-Balkaria, and two of them have been already opened (regnum, December 28). Unlike frontier posts on other Russian territory, the main task of the posts in the Caucasus is not to defend the state border, but rather to prevent the rebels from escaping on the Russian side of the Great Range.

Nevertheless, the latest fierce battle near the mountain village of Gimri in Dagestan clearly demonstrated that the Russian troops are still unable to fight in the mountains, even against small rebel groups. On January 2, a police special-task unit was ambushed near Gimri. Additional troops immediately dispatched to the area also met strong resistance. After three days of shelling and bombing a gorge near the village, the Special Forces moved into the mountains but they only found an empty dugout with no rebels dead or alive. A group numbering between eight and 30 gunmen, according to different sources, had already left the area.

In addition to technical problems of fighting against a mountain-based insurgency, the Russian authorities are simply unable to do anything to stop youth from flooding into the ranks of the rebels. Today widespread and powerful insurgency cells exist even in such relatively peaceful regions as Adygeya (Krasnodar Krai), Karachaevo-Cherkessia, and North Ossetia.

In his latest interview, Shamil Basaev, the Chechen warlord and the commander of all Caucasian rebel forces, described the inability of the authorities to stop the expansion of the war from Chechnya to other regions as a "strategic victory" for the insurgency (Kavkaz-center, January 9). "Even if we had lost all mujahideen who took part in the Nalchik raid, this would have been our victory," Basaev declared. He meant that the very fact that the militants could organize such a large-scale attack 200 miles away from Chechnya is itself a great success and shows how poorly Moscow controls the North Caucasus.

Basaev does not hide the fact that the expanding war is the result of a well-calculated policy. Basaev said that this strategy had been approved by a grand council meeting of field commanders that took place in Chechnya in 2002. He said that when he visited Kabardino-Balkaria two years ago, his calls for armed struggle were ignored by local Muslims, but last spring the Muslims, angered by the authorities' repressive policies, deliberately sought him.

Now Basaev is trying to strengthen the North Caucasus insurgency structure by traveling around the Caucasus. The warlord claims that last year he had meetings with local rebel leaders in Nalchik, Cherkessk (the capital of Karachaevo-Cherkessia), North Ossetia, and Ingushetia.

There is so much evidence of the increasing strength of the Caucasian insurgency under Basaev's command that the Kremlin finally had to recognize this development. "Extremist and terrorist groups operate now in all regions of the Southern Federal District, including Stavropol, Astrakhan, and Volgograd Oblast, and Shamil Basaev is at the head of this criminal organization," Nikolai Shepel, a Russian deputy general prosecutor, conceded this week (Izvestiya, January 9).

The statements from Topchy and Shepel reveal how deeply worried the Kremlin is about the situation in the North Caucasus. However, the Russian government still hopes to solve the problem by deploying more and more specially trained troops. Negotiations are not on the agenda.



To: Richnorth who wrote (12534)2/11/2006 12:38:53 AM
From: Scoobah  Respond to of 32591
 
It isnt balls,

Putin is a craftsman and a dedicated KGB plotter:

Abbas is a seasoned KGB order taker:

He will soon be shown to be Arafat with a suit.

DEBKAfile Analysis: Putin stepped in after Jerusalem missed the boat for thwarting Hamas

February 10, 2006, 6:50 PM (GMT+02:00)

DEBKAfile’s political sources accuse acting prime minister Ehud Olmert and foreign minister Tzipi Livni of doing too little, too late in their campaign to keep the Hamas Islamic terrorists from coming to power.

Russian defense minister Sergei Ivanov predicted correctly that other states will follow suit and favor contacts with Hamas now that the Jerusalem campaign heavily dependent on Washington has gone up in smoke. As he spoke, France jumped aboard.

What this means is -

1. After failing to prevent the election although it was clearly preconfigured for a Hamas victory, the Israeli caretaker government should have struck hard and swiftly to round up the terrorist group’s leaders, all of whom have black records of orchestrating dozens of suicide massacres of Israelis. Instead, Olmert and Livni decided to wait for the “international community” to fight Israel’s wars and then trail in its wake.

2. Russian president Vladimir Putin did not miss the opening left by the inaction of Washington and Jerusalem for scoring points with the Muslim world, which is up in arms against the West over the Prophet Mohammed cartoons.

3. The Olmert government needs to urgently pick up the pieces of its failed strategy and forge a new one with all speed, because otherwise, by next week, Israel – not Hamas – will find itself in diplomatic isolation.

4. Jerusalem must stop stammering over such issues as the transfer of moneys to the Palestinian Authority and abandon its waiting stance – “Let’s first see what sort of government Abu Mazen sets up” – and seize the initiative with clear action.

On Jan. 26, the day after Hamas swept the Palestinian election, Jerusalem’s first response was to wait for Washington to wake up (it was still night) and provide a lead. However, Bush administration officials were just as much at sea as the Israelis over the outcome of the Palestinian election, although it had been forewarned in good time.

That would have been the Olmert government’s big chance for a move to block Hamas’ ride into government. Instead, they waited for Washington to cobble some guidelines together - and Hamas walked off with the initiative.

After that, Israeli officials echoed the US State Department’s decision to leave it to Mahmoud Abbas to clear up the mess and somehow fashion a new Palestinian government that put Hamas in power - invisibly. When he failed, the Egyptians were called in to save the day.

None of these feeble shifts worked, quite simply because Hamas is truly hard-line, through and through. Its rejections of every condition posed for acceptance or aid - recognizing Israel, disarming, honoring international accords – are not presented as the basis for negotiations. They are clear principles, laid down by tough-minded terrorists. Attempts at accommodation will be beaten off. Because of Israel’s diplomatic ineptness, Hamas is now dictating the rules.



To: Richnorth who wrote (12534)2/11/2006 12:43:03 AM
From: Scoobah  Respond to of 32591
 
am curuios to see how this one plays out?

Does Abbas offer this diplomat to his Master Putin in exchange for the Soviet's return to REAL power and influence in the region??

Egyptian diplomat’s Gaza kidnappers demand release of all Palestinian prisoners in Egypt within 48 hours

February 10, 2006, 11:11 PM (GMT+02:00)

An unknown group called Ahrar Brigades used al Jazeera TV Friday night to threaten “tragic consequences” if its demands are not met.

DEBKAfile’s military sources report extreme anxiety in Cairo over the Palestinian security services’ failure to track the masked men who snatched Egyptian naval attaché Hossam al-Musselli from his car in Gaza City Thursday. All Cairo’s efforts to signal the hostage-takers and offer a large ransom have gone unanswered. The abduction of a military officer-diplomat confronts Egypt’s with its first hostage ordeal in its relations with the Palestinians and the first time an Egyptian official’s life has been on the line for the release of jailed Palestinians. The Mubarak government regards this affair as a test of its regional standing no less that last July’s abduction of the Egyptian ambassador in Baghdad Ihab al-Sherif by al Qaeda in Iraq and his execution. Cairo even appealed to Hamas to help locate its missing envoy, but so far with no results.

The day after the Hamas election victory last month, 50 Egyptian military instructors departed the Gaza Strip as a safety precaution and because they judged hopeless any chance of training or setting up any Palestinian unit that they could control. Left in place were only three Egyptian generals and security guards to protect them and the Egyptian Embassy staff.